When it comes to console games, the debate between TVs and monitors has disappeared for years. On the surface, the choice seems simple: casual game players will choose TVs, and competitive gamers will choose gaming monitors. However, as the next generation of PlayStation and Xbox game consoles provide 120 frames per second at an amazing 4K resolution, this debate has become even more important.
You see, to really benefit from these new performance capabilities, you need a matching monitor or TV to match it. 4K 60Hz TV is no longer enough. Fortunately, manufacturers are working hard to bring a large number of high-performance TVs and monitors to the market to support the new HDMI 2.1 standard, which has once again sparked controversy.
In this article, we will answer all major questions about monitors and TVs while gaming. However, before that, we will discuss some of the most common terms you will encounter when buying gaming-related monitors. If you are not familiar with fancy terminology, please read the following sections to familiarize yourself with the need to understand the terminology.
4K resolution (3840×2160)
120Hz stock (overclocking to 144Hz)
eye tracking technology
DisplayHDR compatible 1000
height, pivot and tilt adjustment
4 ms response time
120 Hz 44 4 4 Response time 4 HDMI 44 ms
4K Ultra HD (3840 x 2160)
High refresh rate
Nearly instantaneous pixel response time
HDMI 2.1 compatibility
Elegant design and smooth
Synchronization In case you are not familiar with all of this, we have never really considered if a TV or monitor is best for gaming, we have summarized some necessary terms below.
On the surface, televisions and gaming monitors have many similarities, but the difference lies in the specifications.
On average, gaming monitors will provide a higher refresh rate and pixel density compared to modern televisions. In addition, they generally provide better (lower) entry delay and more stent versatility. Historically, displays have not been that good in terms of color reproduction or maximum screen resolution, but this is no longer the case due to the development of panel technology over the last 35 years. 4K displays that deliver extremely accurate color reproduction are no longer as rare as they used to be, ideal for color-accurate content creators and productivity users.
TVs are generally larger and focus more on better color reproduction and a better viewing experience rather than pure pixel density or responsiveness. Due to the display technology suitable for the classic living room environment, they are often better suited for wide-angle viewing as well.
Due to the advent of OLED technology, some TVs designed specifically for gaming now provide excellent input lag and pixel response time, reducing motion blur and ghosting that can typically occur. Plus, with refresh rates now hitting a dizzying 120Hz, some TVs actually pair with gaming monitors for responsiveness.
In terms of resolution, modern TVs usually offer 1080p or 4K-8K has recently been added. On the other hand, the monitors are more versatile and offer 1080p, 1440p and 4K.
Generally speaking, TVs tend to pay more attention to the original viewing experience and image quality. Or, gaming monitors will balance the specifications as much as possible, and sometimes compromise on one aspect for budget reasons. However, with the recent influx of IPS displays, it has become less and less to sacrifice color accuracy for response.
Considering HDR, there is almost no competition. Although HDR (High Dynamic Range) is becoming more and more popular in the field of gaming monitors, it is still easier for TVs to provide this feature. Also, if you're playing on a PC, most of your content doesn't yet support HDR, while the PS4 Pro, Xbox One S, and Xbox One X do.
Thanks to the increased HDR support and the IPS panel to provide better color reproduction and a better viewing angle, it is not surprising to see so many gamers switch from one TV to another.
In the process of moving from CRT monitors to large flat panel HDTVs, many gamers may have realized that if "Game Mode" is not enabled on the TV, it is almost impossible to play their games. This is because large HDTVs have started to use their own dedicated graphics processing hardware to process higher resolution signals, making the picture look clearer and movement smoother. The
CRT doesn't have this problem, and is still favored by some gamers (look at you, melee players) who want to minimize input lag. The
monitor has never needed a gaming mode to achieve tolerable input lag, and overall the monitor performs much better in this category. Considering the existence of 144hz monitors and 240hz monitors, these monitors are better than any other similar TV in reducing input delay.
Digitally, the fall time of most displays is between 1 millisecond and 5 milliseconds (although some cheaper, larger or IPS screens are slower), but TVs tend to start at 5 milliseconds and then higher; even longer Up to 20 milliseconds. Usually fewer ads and built-in game modes help solve this problem to varying degrees, but the numbers emphasize the slower TV speed.
Let me talk about Sync technology first. Specifically, GSync and FreeSync. These two technologies come from Nvidia and AMD, respectively, and focus on eliminating screen tearing by dynamically matching the refresh rate to the frame rate, increasing the perceived smoothness of doing so. These two technologies essentially do the same thing, and
With soap opera effects, you are unlikely to see the benefits of 120Hz in the game. This is because most TVs that use high refresh rates use a technique called "interpolation," which focuses on reducing ghost images and making motion look smoother. In some cases, this can lead to the so-called "soap opera effect", where TV shows or movies look too smooth and unnatural, even though this has nothing to do with games.
Having said that, some high-end TVs do support these higher refresh rates and are specifically designed for gaming. I just hope to spend more money on this.
Although there are gaming TVs, getting a TV with the required features usually results in a price loss. This is because TVs will eventually be larger, more complex, and more expensive to produce.
Both display technologies have high-end solutions that break the wallet, but even low-end displays provide less delay and input delay than TVs of the same price. If we talk about the great value of pure games, the monitor is undoubtedly the winner.
Now, let's talk about comfort. We will evaluate this in two aspects: viewing distance and viewing angle. The
larger TV makes it more feasible for you to play games on the sofa or bed, and this advantage will only increase your screen size. The display size is smaller, you need to be closer to the screen. Unless you have hundreds of dollars to spend on a high-end gaming chair, the truth is that you won’t be as comfortable sitting at your desk as curling up on a sofa or lying on a bed.
Of course, sitting at a desk is not a problem for PC gamers. The additional benefit of response speed completely exceeds this problem. The
TV benefits from excellent viewing angles, allowing you to sit in many places in the living room without changing the colors. Although IPS displays have better viewing angles than TN displays, they are more expensive and not worth it for hardcore gamers. The TV has the advantages of wide viewing angle and large size.
Although the viewing angle of the TV seems to be better than the monitor, remember that you may be sitting in front of the monitor while playing games. In most cases, using a wide viewing angle is useless.
What is the score on the door? In this section, we will make a brief summary, as well as our final verdict and some suggestions.
TVs get an excellent viewing experience at a lower price and have better HDR support than monitors. For this reason, we chose a TV for this category, but if you are willing to spend more on the monitor, you can get better picture quality.
monitors won this category, no doubt. Even high-end gaming TVs with fast response times and high refresh rates are relatively inexpensive. Even IPS panel gaming monitors now have incredibly low input latency, making it a full sweep for the monitor.
If you want to play games with a high refresh rate and actually use a frame rate above 60, a gaming monitor is an obvious choice. Most TVs with high refresh rates only use these refresh rates for interpolation, not the original visual performance, and some even have worse input lags than screens. Both TVs and monitors support
variable refresh rate technology, but the latter is much cheaper. Compared to monitors that do not support these features, FreeSync and GSync monitors still have a high price premium, so if you plan to buy, be sure to use this technology.
For those who just want a stable gaming experience at a low price, using a gaming monitor is easier to achieve this goal than using a TV, especially if you are a competitive game player.
When we compare monitors with TVs used in games, it is clear that the monitor wins. However, if you prioritize watching over broadcasting, you might argue that TV is the best option. In other words, with the latest gaming monitors with IPS panels, HDR and wide viewing angles, gaming monitors are undoubtedly the winner.
Last but not least is convenience. Because of the longer viewing distance and wider viewing angle, TV ultimately wins. TV is the first choice for couch games and local multiplayer games for a reason, they just create a better overall experience.
Yes, lazily lying on the couch while gaming is the most comfortable option, but with a high-end gaming monitor equipped with an IPS panel, you can get great viewing angles and you can choose to buy a 4K ultra-wide monitor set, So much There is something worth saying. The
monitors seem to be a better choice for pure gaming performance and latency, and we've beaten more categories, so we have a clear winner.
With that said, in some cases you may want to switch to a TV. For example, if you're playing a single-player casual game, televisions and sofas can provide more than just table and monitor settings.
Also, if you're using an Xbox Series X or PS5, a TV with HDR may be a more viable option, although there are of course great monitors for console games.
If you are not serious about playing a game and you don't have the technology to handle a high refresh rate screen, then the ability to sit back, relax and play on a wide screen television will be better than lying on a desk and frantically pressing keys and buttons.
Games are all about choice, after all, especially PC games. The winner here really depends on what you want from the gaming experience.
If you are a competitive gamer and want to be on top of the leaderboard, participate in esports, and push yourself as hard as possible, buy a gaming monitor.
But for social gamers
Television, monitor improves overall performance.
This depends on the specifications of the monitor or television it has, but it is a better option for the entire monitor. This is because the response time is fast compared to television. Although the response time is not important to watch television programs and movies, they are particularly important for the game.
In addition to this, there is a delay entered when the monitor decreases. In other words, the graphics will be shown faster and will redeem the delay compared to television. Although the delay is not remarkable for most people, if you have an old television screen, you can notice the difference. The monitors are created to create higher update rates, so monitoring update rates are much better compared to television. In other words, it means that the game becomes more transparent when using a monitor using a television. This is especially true if you are using a game monitor. This has more than one purpose, since they have been created in mind and are created in mind. While the PC
monitor is a preferred option through a television, this does not mean that you can not use a TV for the game. You can use absolutely the monitor for the game on the PC.
As mentioned above, only the need to consider is the input delay, update frequency and response time. Most televisions have slow specifications compared to the use of the monitor. However, if you are most, it is less likely to notify this difference, especially if you use a new TV model. If you are looking for cheaper options, they can be cheaper to buy, so television is a great idea.
In addition to this, it is useful to use television as a monitor if you already have one. I would like to save money instead of buying a monitor.
It is completely your choice, whether you use a TV or monitor to play Xbox. However, as described in this article, if you are using Xbox only for the game, the monitor will be a better option for you.
Response time of the monitor screen, the update frequency, FPS is much better than television. Given this, it is a better option. However, most Xbox users use Xbox for different purposes, such as watching television and movies.
If you are looking for a versatile screen, make a TV easier to use. Before selecting between two, it is serious to select it using what Xbox is using. When you choose to use a TV or monitor using PS5, the answer is very similar to the welfare of Xbox and a question. For games, the monitor is always a preferred option if it is always available.
This is because the response time, FPS and the update rate are excellent. This allows you to succeed in the game. However, if you use PS5, they will be purchased to reproduce divided screens or multiplayer games. In this case, since several players are slightly larger and easier to use, television can be a better option. In addition to this, I also saw a television show and a movie.
But if you are looking for the best option to make the most of your game experience, you will want to choose to use the monitor instead.
When you select the size of the TV used for the game, you can make the game game easier when the TV increases. But this is not really like that.
Usually, the greater the television, the slower performance. If you are playing a particularly strict game, you may not notice this. However, if you are playing fast shooting games, you will notice that a larger television is slow.
There is not a big difference, but the largest television is approximately 1/10 of approximately 1/10 slower than the monitor. In some cases, this delay will be the presence. So that they are not the best option to select, while the TV is not bad for the game.
The answer to this question depends entirely on the individual prices of the monitor and television. Sometimes, the monitor will be cheaper, but it is not in most cases.
Televisions can be quite expensive, and are particularly with a game and do not have a game. On the other hand, the monitor is built with the game with the game in mind. Comparing the prices of Monitor 4K and TV, televisions are cheaper because the PC monitor is a higher margin product of margin products.