Ryzen 5 2600 vs 2600x
Choosing a new computer processor to update your existing game setup is a daunting task, and since these things seem to have variants of the same name, they're even more challenging. It's confusing?
If you can't tell your Xprocessors apart from regular processors, don't worry. This article will compare the two best products AMD offers for budget gamers. They are Ryzen 5 2600x and Ryzen 7 2700x, so you can choose the CPU that suits you best.
Are you ready? Let's get into it.
3.6 GHz-range 4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz-4.3 GHz
8 / 16
TDP 105 W
If you've managed to narrow down your CPU selection to one of AMD's Ryzen processors, congratulations. You have done a lot of difficult work yourself, because in the duel between Intel and AMD, choosing a side is half the battle.
Your grip on the GPU market may not be exactly the same, because Nvidia is a leader in this field, but in terms of CPUs, AMD is known for producing great products with good value for money.
But are Ryzen 5 2600x and Ryzen 7 2700x really deserved? We tend to say yes, but let's take a look at some of the most important features to consider when buying a new CPU to show you how we came to this conclusion. Let's take a look at some of the key features to consider, such as the number of cores and threads, clock speed, architecture, and multitasking. Although
belongs to different generations, they may be similar, but if you consider upgrading, these features will help us determine which CPU should be your first choice and which CPU is best suited for you and your gaming needs.
is different from graphics cards, games can bring many challenges and requirements (so the number of cores is very high), the computer processor is much less dependent on the core, so the total number is much less. In fact, most gaming systems actually only use 1-2 cores, so single-core performance has the biggest impact on the quality of your games.
This will directly affect the multitasking capabilities of the processor, if you tend to run multiple programs in the background you should definitely consider this. If this is the case, then a higher number of cores will be more beneficial for you. The
2700x runs on 8 cores, while the 2600x only has 6 cores. Both are fully capable of running any modern game, giving you smooth and near-perfect performance for a more immersive gaming experience, but the 2700x does the best.
Just because they are virtual does not mean that they should be ignored, because the number of threads is as important as the cores, because they also contribute to the multitasking capabilities of the CPU. The 2600x has 12 threads, which is a good number, but the 2700x tops the list with 16 threads to better organize multitasking.
But how do these statistics play a role in performance quality?
Speaking of clock speed, it is obvious that 2700x and 2600x are almost the same. They are very close in terms of speed, there is almost no obvious difference between the two, and both exceed the minimum recommended requirement for games, which is 3.4 GHz. With the
advantage of only 0.1 GHz, the 2700x barely surpassed the leading 3.7 GHz base clock speed, while the 2600x had a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz.
When you look at the increased clock speed of each CPU, the situation is the same, because the 2700x again only surpasses the pre-released 2600x, reaching an increased clock speed of up to 4.3 GHz, and then up to 4.2 GHz, so the 2700x will behave when overclocked It has to be slightly better.
The close result certainly makes us question the validity of the hypothetical benefits of additional cores and threads, but does the difference become more apparent elsewhere? Let us can't wait to know!
If you are familiar with any of our GPU comparison films, you may already know what the architecture means for games, but in fact they have some similarities in this respect, which makes it more difficult to crown. winner. But, as always, we will do our best. The
2700x uses AMD’s Zen + architecture, which provides reasonable improvements compared to the previous Zen architecture, without the latest advancements found in its new Zen2 architecture, such as (confusingly) the one used for the 3700x CPU Third Generation. The
2600x is also equipped with the Zen+ architecture, and the 12nm process is used in the manufacture of this micro-architecture. Once again, it offers improvements to the previous cards released with previous generations of Zen architecture, but it is not the best money you can buy. However, for a CPU with a limited budget, it can handle multitasking to a certain extent, and provide a reasonable cache size, as well as fewer opportunities for delay. As you can see, the only cache capacity they share is the L3 cache, but beyond that, the 2700x is the best choice for running games without latency or buffering issues. Both
2600x and 2700x have the best AM4 chipsets and are backward compatible with old motherboards, making them very suitable for users who cannot upgrade their CPUs at the same time. It is also a good choice if you want the PC to face the future.