Skip to content

Change steam account name

AMD and Nvidia are well known companies in the field of games, that is, in the field of PC games, but this does not mean that they have not set foot in game consoles either. In this article, we'll cover everything you need to know about these tech giants and who is among the best.

AMD vs. Nvidia, whose side are you on? Without further ado, let's find out who made the best graphics card.

AMD or Advanced Micro Devices is the second largest brand in the field of personal computing. As Intel’s only competitors in the CPU market, both are constantly pushing the limits of x86 and x64 processors in the entire industry. The recently released Ryzen has brought AMD back into the competition. This is a battle that has lasted for decades, and it looks as fierce as ever.

So where did the graphics come from? So this is where Radeon appears.

Radeon was originally an ATI brand, not an AMD brand. From the 1990s to the mid-2000s, ATI or Array Technology Inc. was Nvidia's main competitor in the field of PC graphics, so Nvidia initially faced Nvidia. Give you. In 2006, AMD acquired the ATI and Radeon brands. The new brand of AMD Radeon becomes a competitor to Nvidia GeForce, making AMD the smallest competitor in the CPU and GPU market. Radeon

GPU is a gaming graphics card for consumers. In recent years, they have been marked with R3, R5, R9 and RX variants.

Nvidia became one of the many competitors in the PC graphics field in the 1990s along with 3DFX and ATI. Although the GPU wars of the 1990s were an interesting period, they led to many acquisitions and bankruptcies until only two competitors remained: Nvidia and ATI.

Obviously we know what happened to ATI, but since then Nvidia has been steadily climbing the market. By transitioning to the PS3/360 era, they gained market dominance over ATI before the AMD acquisition.

However, in addition to PC graphics cards, NVIDIA is also well-known in other markets, especially self-driving cars and artificial intelligence. Although both companies are interested in the mobile device and game console market, Nvidia has become more adventurous in its non-graphics output, which may be due to its market position.

GeForce is just the brand Nvidia uses for its graphics cards. Unlike AMD, there is no real story behind the brand name here. The brands of

GeForce GPU are GT, GTX and RTX.

Since the merger of ATI and AMD, Nvidia and AMD have been the only remaining independent GPU manufacturers in the PC gaming market. Just like AMD's position in the CPU market and Intel's, they account for a much smaller share of the overall market and are generally regarded as losers.

There is no doubt: AMD's money is definitely much less than Nvidia. Nvidia’s mining pool accounts can create new GPU architectures more frequently and diversify in areas such as autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence. With the debut of SHIELD hardware, Nvidia has even taken a big step towards mobile technology that AMD has not yet reflected.

Gamingwise, both companies played a prominent role in the game console war. Xbox 360 and Nintendo Wii both use ATI (AMD) GPU, while PlayStation 3 uses an improved Nvidia GPU. In the current generation of game consoles, AMD has customized APU/SoC for PS4 and Xbox One, while Nvidia has adjusted its SHIELD technology for Nintendo Switch.

From an economic and overall point of view, Nvidia is likely to be winning. However, AMD is unlikely to get anywhere anytime soon. If you look at their actual GPU products, the competitiveness of the two is much stronger than you think. With the frequent price and performance battles between multiple generations, it can almost be assumed that while Nvidia will always dominate the highest level of performance, AMD will wage a fierce battle between budget and mid-range.

Before we compare hardware, let's take a moment to talk about synchronization technology and software products.

Basically, these two technologies try to do the same thing: remove screen tearing from the equation, ensure a consistent frame rate, and provide an overall smoother gaming experience. They do this through a technology called "AdaptiveSync," which dynamically adjusts the refresh rate of the screen to match the current frame rate it is playing. This makes playback at a lower average frame rate smoother and helps reduce screen tearing that usually accompanies higher frame rates without the input lag caused by VSync.

Generally speaking, both will work fine, but Nvidia's implementation is more expensive because it requires dedicated hardware within the display to work. In contrast, FreeSync only needs an updated DisplayPort port and a compatible AMD GPU to function properly.

In terms of software products in general, Nvidia once had a significant advantage in this regard. Nowadays, if there are Nvidia features like Share / Shadowplay, AMD can match them. There are still some games that provide specific optimizations and graphics effects for one of the two manufacturers. However, over time, these situations become less and less due to negative reception and perceived anti-competitive behavior.

We will allow these two GPU manufacturers to compete with each other in five key price ranges. In addition to performance, we also consider value, so if there is a serious cost of value, the original graphics capabilities cannot guarantee the benefits of each category.

At the enthusiast level, we selected the three best GPUs on the market and compared them with each other.

AMD has not yet competed in the field of enthusiasts, but its RX 6000 series "Big NAVI" card will be released soon, and the legendary RTX 3090 will have a competitor.

Nvidia's latest flagship GPU, in many respects, it is one of the best graphics cards we have ever seen, breaking the previous generation of Nvidia graphics cards, and of course AMD. Use RTX 3090

A 12-pin connector consumes 350 watts of power. Finally, to take advantage of the power of this card, you have to pair it with the fastest gaming processor on the market. This is not a cheap card, oh no, at this price you will get twice the video memory as the RTX 3080, much less faster. The card also has over 20% CUDA, Tensor, and RT cores, and we see support for NVLink as well.

Thanks to this scalable VRAM, the RTX 3090 now has more computing power and improved capabilities for rendering complex 3D scenes. In addition, 24GB of RAM is required to support 8K games.

In terms of raw performance, the RTX 2080 Ti easily beats many other graphics cards on this list, and it is not far from the RTX Titan GPU. The results show that compared with 1080 Ti, the performance is improved by more than 30%. Compared with Radeon VII, the performance is improved by about 50%. The price difference between

RTX 2080 Ti and RTX Titan is thousands of dollars, and the performance difference is only 10%. In any case, it is not worth it, especially if you are just a player.

Below the absurd level of performance of the RTX 3090, the battle has died down. The RTX 3080 is unrivaled at this price. Now the actual performance is unfortunately not as groundbreaking as the ad would have us believe, but this is one of the fastest graphics cards ever. Considering its price matches previous RTX 2080 generations, this is a must. -Final PC version. Benchmark tests show that the excellent RTX 3080 has achieved remarkable results. Among many AAA games at 1440p, its performance is ahead of the previous generation 2080 and 2080 TI. Compared to

and 2080, this card provides a 20% to 70% improvement, but we have seen more impressive results when studying 4K games. With RTX 3080, NVIDIA has changed the rules of the game and provided an excellent solution for ordinary gamers, professional consumers and even some professionals who want to build powerful and affordable gaming devices or workstations.

For pure performance, future-oriented technologies such as ray tracing, and excellent FPS counting, RTX 3080 is your best choice and easily win this category.

Initially, the two competitors in this category were GTX 1070 and RX Vega 56. In the battle between Radeon and Nvidia, RX Vega 56 led the GTX 1070 by a narrow margin. That said, this is not appropriate for Nvidia. Just a few months later, the 1070 Ti was released and regained its leadership in the category as it found its performance to be closer to GTX 1080.

Over time, the release of the RX 5700 XT appeared, and of course Nvidia released the latest RTX graphics card. This changed the mid-range market again, and Nvidia ultimately didn't do it in its own way. On the surface, the RTX 2070 is a better graphics card; it is equipped with future-oriented technology and provides better performance (and nothing else). That said, the RTX 2070 is a more expensive component, which makes the competition between these two cards very interesting. RX 5700 XT offers consumers great value at an almost unmatched price and performance, and because of this, AMD has achieved success here. The

GTX 1060 dominated this category for a long time, but then the GTX 1660 Super appeared. For a long time, AMD has not been affected by AMD in this category, but AMD has made up the gap with its Radeon 5600XT GPU.

Although the overall performance of the Radeon 5600XT is better, it is only around 1015%, which is also reflected in the price. GTX 1660 Super is an excellent graphics card, although both options can provide stable gaming effects, the economy of GTX 1660 Super is unmatched.

AMD's RX 580 is now about four years old and its architecture is out of date compared to the just released GTX 1650 Super. Compared to the 580, the efficiency of the 1650 Super is incredible and this newer GPU can produce better FPS results in many games. However, the prices of the cards are very similar, which can cause some headaches when it comes to choosing the best entry-level card. Of course, the RX 580 used to be one of AMD's mid-range GPUs, but with the advancement of technology, we now see it in a very affordable position. The

benchmark results depend on the game, but the RX 580 is among the best in games that benefit from a large amount of VRAM. It is precisely because of the extra memory you get with the RX 580 that this GPU stands out today because, overall, it can provide your system with a longer lifespan.

The winner ultimately depends on your personal needs as a player. In some categories, the original performance has lost its top value, so add a little salt to each result.

However, it is clear that Nvidia is an outstanding winner in the graphics card market, providing enthusiasts and gamers with excellent high-end graphics cards. The RTX 3090 is currently untouchable, and even the older RTX Titan has many shortcomings. Although AMD has made great strides in the GPU market,

Nvidia is a winner in most of the categories we outlined above. Although the RX series produced exceptional performance, they can only compete with Nvidia's mid-range graphics cards.

When we look at who the winner is from a value perspective, AMD is outperforming its competitors through a variety of options to meet various low-end budgets. Good value for money is important to many people and

As one of the weakest in the CPU and GPU manufacturing industry. The fact remains, however, that its earnings are considerable, and its existence helps prevent Intel and Nvidia's price and performance from stalling. We don't recommend buying company loyalty, but as long as AMD offers competitive options within your price range, you should consider buying from them.

We hope this article helps you show the current position of AMD and Nvidia in the GPU battle. What GPU are you currently using? What are you going to upgrade to? Comment below and let us know!

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields