Skip to content

Call of duty black ops cold war cyber monday

Update: See our "Where to Buy" page for more information on these AMD CPUs:

. Until recently, Intel was still the leader in gaming CPUs, its single-threaded performance was more powerful, and AMD dominated building workstations. job. which required more memory cache performance and multi-core health. Zen 2 3950X has always been one of AMD's crown jewels in the dominance of the workstation market, but with Zen 3 5950X, AMD is trying to combine this workstation advantage with gaming performance that it can win. Intel's crown. Let's take a closer look at the information currently available and see if they are successful.

speed 3.4 GHz /

4.9 GHz core (wire)

16/32

plug

AM4 TDP

105W

speed 3.5 GHz / 4.7 GHz

core (wire)

16 / 32

socket

AM4 TDP

105 W

"Zen" is AMD's term for different generations of CPU architectures. 3950X is based on Zen 2 architecture and 5950X is based on Zen 3. Although Zen 2 and Zen 3 are based on the 7nm process, AMD has greatly improved the Zen 3 technology, increasing IPC (instructions per clock) and the energy efficiency of the same process.

Most of the performance improvement of the new Zen 3 is due to AMD's changes to the cache design. AMD can now simultaneously access 8 CPU cores and 32MB of L3 memory cache instead of two batches of 16MB of L3 memory, each with four CPU cores. With these enhancements, any kernel can directly access any part of the data stored in a single large memory pool (for example, data related to the physics of objects left in the game world), instead of the data having to traverse the Infinity structure` in a separate cache Between the segments and the cores that must communicate with each other to access these individual cache segments. This means faster processing speed, thereby reducing game latency. So in fact, 3950x has 4x16MB cache section, each with 4 cores (8 threads), while 5950x has 2x32MB cache section, each with 8 cores (16 threads)-the same amount of memory. The general kernel is just more efficient to use.

"Zen" is a term used by AMD for its different generations of CPU architectures. 3950X is based on Zen 2 architecture, and 5950X is based on Zen 3. Although Zen 2 and Zen 3 are based on the 7nm process, AMD has greatly improved Zen 3's technology, increasing IPC (instructions per clock) and the energy efficiency of the same process.

Most of the performance improvement of the new Zen 3 is due to AMD's changes to the cache design. AMD can now simultaneously access 8 CPU cores and 32MB of L3 memory cache instead of two batches of 16MB of L3 memory, each with four CPU cores. With these enhancements, any kernel can directly access any part of the data stored in a single large memory pool (for example, data related to the physics of objects left in the game world), instead of the data having to traverse the Infinity structure` in a separate cache Between the segments and the cores that must communicate with each other to access these individual cache segments. This means faster processing speed, thereby reducing game latency. So in fact, 3950x has 4x16MB cache section, each with 4 cores (8 threads), while 5950x has 2x32MB cache section, each with 8 cores (16 threads)-the same amount of memory. The general kernel is just more efficient to use.

At first glance, you may notice that the base clock speed of the 5950X is actually slightly lower than that of the 3950X. Although this may seem counterintuitive at first, clock speed is only part of the performance story. The architectural enhancements above mean that the 5950X's Instructions Per Clock (IPC) has increased significantly, so the total number of instructions on the CPU can exceed at any given time. Is older.

Although newer games are beginning to take advantage of multiprocessor capabilities, and this trend may increase, the important metric in games is still single-core performance. Single-core (or even threaded) performance is also an important consideration for certain applications like Adobe Photoshop. The aim of the AMD 5950X is to create a CPU that can handle heavy tasks like the 3950X and has single-core gaming capabilities. In theory, the new model should be superior to the Zen 2 processor in this regard. .

The numbers below are taken from the Rzyen 5000 introductory demo on October 8, 2020, showing the 5950X outperforming the 3950X by 14% - 29%. Although these numbers are impressive, they represent only four games tested and since they are from AMD, they should be reserved for them.

At first glance, you may notice that the base clock speed of the 5950X is actually slightly lower than that of the 3950X. Although this may seem counterintuitive at first, clock speed is only part of the performance story. The architectural enhancements above mean that the 5950X's Instructions Per Clock (IPC) has increased significantly, so the total number of instructions on the CPU can exceed at any given time. Is older.

Although newer games are beginning to take advantage of multiprocessor capabilities, and this trend may increase, the important metric in games is still single-core performance. Single-core (or even threaded) performance is also an important consideration for certain applications like Adobe Photoshop. The goal of AMD 5950X is to create a CPU that can perform as many multi-core overloads as 3950X, but also has single-core gaming capabilities, which is theoretically the latest.

Since they come from AMD, they should be taken with a little salt.

independent benchmark tests are of course actual tests, the following is the current information we can use, but please note that most of them have not been thoroughly verified. As more test data comes out after the CPU is publicly released, we will update it further.

independent benchmark tests are of course actual tests, the following is the current information we can use, but please note that most of them have not been thoroughly verified. As more test data comes out after the CPU is publicly released, we will update it further.

As you can see, PassMark’s single-threaded performance test placed the new AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at the top with a score of 3,693, beating Intel’s best single-core performance in the gaming category. , Although it will cost an extra $250. It should be noted that the PassMark score of 5950X is no longer available, which may mean that the tested CPU has undergone some serious overclocking to achieve this score, but it still looks promising. Either way, in comparison, the 3950X ranks 42nd on the list with a score of 2,747.

As you can see, PassMark’s single-threaded performance test placed the new AMD Ryzen 9 5950X at the top with a score of 3,693, beating Intel’s best single-core performance in the gaming category. , Although it will cost an extra $250. It should be noted that the PassMark score of 5950X is no longer available, which may mean that the tested CPU has undergone some serious overclocking to achieve this score, but it still looks promising. Either way, in comparison, the 3950X ranks 42nd on the list with a score of 2,747.

In terms of the CPUZ benchmark test, what we have to do now is the following leaks. According to Videocardz, the picture below is taken from a Chinese forum and shows the single-core performance of the 5950x with a score of 690.

In the CPUZ benchmark test, we currently only need to follow the following leaks. According to Videocardz, the image below is from a Chinese forum and shows the single-core performance of 5950x with a score of 690. In contrast, the Intel Core i910900K hit 584 in the same test, while the 3950X hit 547.

As we've seen, assuming these numbers are accurate, the 5950X's single-core performance is significantly better than the of the 3950X, especially for products that are only $ 50 more. In contrast, the Intel Core i910900K hit 584 in the same test, while the 3950X hit 547.

As we've seen, assuming these numbers are accurate, the 5950X's single-core performance is significantly better than the of the 3950X, especially for products that are only $ 50 more.

Until now, the AMD 3950x has been a favorite of small and medium-sized entrepreneurs / creative enthusiasts. For YouTube users, Twitch anchors, video editors, animators and 3D modelers, and music producers, 3950x provides everything needed for a CPU centralized on a workstation, especially a large number of cores and cache, but the price is lower than high-end professionals . The processor is usually referred to as a HEDT (High-End Desktop) CPU. The heavyweight in the

HEDT field is AMD’s Threadripper series, the cheapest of which is $1,350, which is mainly aimed at advanced creative entrepreneurs who need to manage multiple streams, high compression rate, heavy decompression workload, and high-use requirements for advanced creative entrepreneurs 3D modeling software. Like a blender. AMD's EPYC series also provide extreme multi-core performance at a higher price, although these are more suitable for server construction and exceed the needs and requirements of retail consumers. The 3950x, which is as low as about $600, obviously cannot match the performance of the lowest Threadripper processor in workstation tasks, but in terms of price/performance, it swept the product closest to Intel and has been the industry's favorite since its launch. emission. The

5950X has the same number of cores and cache as the 3950X, so its performance in workstation tasks should be at least as good as the 3950X, although with the aforementioned architectural improvements, we expect this to increase. The following is the data provided by AMD at the press conference on October 8. Although they don't show significant growth in Adobe Premiere, for CAD SolidWorks 2019, the additional 27% is impressive.

Until now, the AMD 3950x has been a favorite of small and medium-sized entrepreneurs / creative enthusiasts. For YouTube users, Twitch presenters, video editors, 3D animators and modelers, and music producers, the 3950x provides all the needs in a workstation-centric CPU, especially a high number of cores and cache, but the price of the processors is lower than the high-end. professionals are often referred to as HEDT (high-end desktop) CPUs. The heavyweight in the

HEDT field is AMD's Threadripper series. The cheapest is $ 1,350. It is primarily aimed at high-income creative entrepreneurs who need to manage multiple streams, have high compression and decompression workloads, and have demanding 3D modeling software requirements. Blender. AMD's EPYC series also provides extreme multi-core performance at a higher price point, although they are better suited for server builds and exceed the needs and requirements of retail consumers. The price of the 3950x is about $ 600 lower, which is obviously not comparable to the performance of the lower Threadripper processor in workstation tasks, but based on price / performance, it has outperformed Intel's closest product and been in the industry since its launch. launch. Favourite. The

5950X has the same number of cores and caches as the 3950X, so it should be at least as good as the 3950X at workstation tasks, although we expect this to increase as the aforementioned architecture improves. The following is

Very impressive.

In PassMark's so-called "high-end CPU" graphics, considering multi-threading rather than single-core performance, 5950X once again surpassed 3950X, 45,564 points higher than the Zen card's 39,279 score. 2. It is even close to the 48,021 achieved by EPYC 7502P, which is almost $1,750 less. The performance of the

workstation affects several different areas, and is often different between different software, which is a bit complicated to compare. As we get more information from independent testers, we can get a more complete picture, but for now, the 5950X seems to be taking over the workstation and gaming functions. Really a master in these two fields.

In PassMark's so-called "high-end CPU" chart, considering multi-threaded rather than single core, 5950X once again outperformed 3950X, scored 45564 compared to 39279 from Zen 2 card, and even close to 48021 EPYC 7502P, which is almost $ 1,750 cheaper. The performance of the

workstation involves several different areas and often differs between software. Benchmarks are a bit more complicated. As independent testers give us more information, we can get a more complete picture, but for now, the 5950X seems to perform well in terms of workstations and gaming features. Truly a master in two fields.

The last thing to consider when comparing the 3950X and 5950X is if you plan to buy a new Radeon 6000 series graphics card from AMD. As discussed in more detail here, the Smart Memory Access feature enables Ryzen 5000 Series CPUs to gain additional performance by using GPU memory more efficiently. In the games that AMD showed us, the performance ranges from 2% to 13 times the FPS. This is basically a free performance. Anyone who wants to buy one of the newer Radeons will really miss out if they use it with the new 3950X, in this case the 5950X will be the obvious choice.

The last thing to consider when comparing the 3950X and 5950X is if you plan to buy a new Radeon 6000 series graphics card from AMD. As discussed in more detail here, the Smart Memory Access feature enables Ryzen 5000 Series CPUs to gain additional performance by using GPU memory more efficiently. In the games that AMD showed us, the performance ranges from 2% to 13 times the FPS. This is basically a free performance. Anyone who wants to buy one of the newer Radeons will really miss out if they use it with the new 3950X, in this case the 5950X will be the obvious choice.

Based on all of the above factors, 5950X is ahead of 3950X in gaming and workstation usage. As expected, gaming performance makes the biggest difference, with the 5950X's single-core performance better than any other product on the market. If you are planning to buy one of the newer Radeon 6000 series GPUs, then you haven't even considered the added benefits of smart access memory, if you don't already have 3950X and are deciding between the two.

In terms of workstation performance, the difference between the Zen 2 and Zen 3 CPUs doesn't seem all that obvious, but further independent benchmarks will clarify this. However, for the $ 50 difference, if you buy a new CPU from the market and don't own it, there is no reason not to buy a 5950X, especially if you are a PC gaming streamer or YouTube user. The only thing to note is if the price of 3950X falls sharply in the next few months. If history has anything to do with this, the new 3950X is unlikely to fall sharply, but if you don’t mind buying second-hand goods, you may see some bargains.

However, the key question here is, if you already own a 3950X, is the 5950X worth upgrading? If you bought the 3950 for $749 last year, even if the performance of the 5950X has been significantly improved, you are unlikely to spend an extra $799 on the new processor, unless of course you must have the best. Better, money is not a problem. Of course, you can consider selling your 3950X, especially if you want to buy a newer Radeon 6000 series GPU to reduce the impact on your wallet. Or stick with the 3950X to see what AMD will bring next year. Whether it's a new Red Team product or a 5950X price reduction, it may be a viable strategy.

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields