Skip to content

Call duty modern warfare system requirements

As far as I can remember, AMD and Intel have been competing for CPU dominance, and Intel has been in the lead for the past 15 years or so. However, due to AMD's Ryzen series, which is a series of custom designs to regain the number one processing CPU, the gap between AMD and Intel has become less obvious.

As we all know, Ryzen recently announced the release date of its latest Ryzen 5000 series CPU product line, sparking a lot of debate about whether Intel is still the best in terms of game performance. For several years, Ryzen CPU has been narrowing the gap between itself and Intel, and the latest generation is expected to surpass its competitors for the first time in what appears to be forever.

Buy the Ryzen 5000 series on Amazon now!

AMD released some very interesting performance benchmarks on the day of the live release, calling the new Zen 3 CPU "the place where the game begins." The gaming benchmark test focused on the difference between AMD’s flagship Ryzen 5 5900X and Intel’s i910900K, the former being among the best in most games. Thanks to this, and what we have seen very little on the other CPUs that make up the Ryzen 5000, the Internet has fallen into chaos trying to find the CPU that best suits its specific needs.

So, for this reason, let us take a closer look at the latest products from AMD and Intel to see which one you should buy.

For the purposes of this article, we only look at the latest CPUs of each brand. For those who do not fully understand the latest hardware, here are the current processors from AMD and Intel:

As we have already mentioned, the gap between Intel and AMD has been narrowing since the introduction of Ryzen (a CPU lineup). Designed to regain the top spot in the CPU hierarchy. However, AMD now says that its latest Ryzen product line may outperform Intel for the first time in more than 15 years.

That is, over the years, we've seen a lot of keynote speeches from AMD and Intel, both of which either provided performance data that was later proven to be incorrect or collected in custom scenarios for personal gain.

Take for example the Zen 2 Ryzen 3000 series released last year. In the keynote address, AMD claimed to have designed a chip that will outperform Intel in both gaming and multi-core workloads. However, when independent third-party commenters began publishing their own results, this was not the case; many of these results put Intel behind AMD in games.

's most recent keynote (Zen Announcement 3-October 7) has a performance improvement of up to 20% compared to the Intel i910900K. If true, this is definitely huge for AMD as a brand. Not only will it bring AMD back to the top of the list, but it should also consolidate its position for some time to come.

With this in mind, let's take a closer look at the Ryzen 9 5950X and see what it can provide.

Unfortunately, Intel does not currently offer any similar desktop CPUs in this performance category. Although we cannot compare with Intel, we can see if it is worth the $799 starting price that AMD rated it.

First of all, AMD calls the 5950X CPU the "best of both worlds". For desktop CPUs, it provides unparalleled performance in both workstation and gaming scenarios. It provides up to 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock frequency of 3.4GHz. For a single core, the clock frequency can be increased to 4.9GHz, which is very useful for games that still require a lot of processor power.

Thanks to the new architecture, the CPU core can now communicate in a more efficient manner. This improves the performance of multithreaded workloads on certain tasks by almost 50%.

That being said, is $ 799 considered good value for money? Well, this is a tough question. This CPU is definitely customized according to the market demographics. If you just like to play games, this CPU will definitely not show the best price / performance ratio. However, if you want both excellent workstation performance and love to play games, then this CPU is definitely required.

Next, we compare Ryzen 9 5900X with Intel i910900K, which is the correct prerequisite for a true comparison between AMD and Intel.

As can be seen from the above table, each problematic CPU provides high core count, high thread count, and high base/boost frequency-this is exactly what you need in the workflow of games and workstations. In other words, Rzyen 9 5900X and Intel i910900K are very different. It will be very interesting to see what it offers.

Let us first look at some of the advantages of buying AMD products. 5900X has 12 cores/24 threads (2 cores are more effective than Intel),

combined 70MB cache, supports 3200MHz+RAM, has a lower TDP, and is highly compatible with AM4 400/500 series motherboards.

In contrast, Intel's single-core maximum boost frequency is higher, and the full-core maximum boost frequency is higher, and the price is much cheaper. Thanks to Intel’s latest professionals, this makes it more difficult to choose between the two processors.

On paper, from a gaming perspective, you would expect Intel to be better. It has a higher clock speed than AMD, and historically has a much higher performance standard than its competitors.

Having said that, the initial gaming performance shown by AMD will indicate otherwise.

From a gaming point of view, separating these two CPUs will be a very difficult process. I think it all boils down to personal benchmarks when the new AMD CPUs were released. This will ultimately be the decisive factor.

Next

Frequency, Intel gets the biggest single-core clock boost (5.3GHz). On the other hand, AMD can have a higher Allcore 100MHz maximum clock boost frequency of 4.8GHz. The

5800X also has a larger combo cache, supports higher clock memory, and is part of the 105W TDP.

However, Intel is once again much cheaper than AMD's products, and was more than $60 cheaper than its competitors when it was launched. This is an increase of nearly 20% for AMD. If history tells us anything, it is that you may not see a 20% performance increase compared to Intel alternatives. In other words, it still has better multi-core performance, uses a 7nm process node, and is backward compatible with its older 400/500 series motherboards-which Intel cannot match at all.

Finally, we come to the economic showdown, Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel's i510600K. For me, this may be the most intriguing battle in the new Ryzen lineup, mainly because the 10600K is such an excellent gaming processor. A quick look at the

specifications, these processors actually don't have much in common, except that they each provide 6 cores and 12 threads. AMD's basic clock frequency is 3.7GHz (400MHz slower than Intel), and the maximum core acceleration clock is also slower (4.6GHz slower than Intel's 4.7GHz). In other words, the Ryzen 5 5600X is based on the 7nm process and is equipped with almost three times the effective cache. Ryzen also provides 3200MHz memory support and is a part of the 65W TDP.

Since there is no prior benchmark test, we can only use the 3600X as a flexible benchmark, using the same percentage of performance improvement from 3900X to 5900X as a rough guide. In other words, if we expect the same performance improvement from 3900X to 5900X, I would like the 5600X to appear above 10600K. However, at this stage, this is pure speculation.

So the only answer is whether you should choose AMD or Intel the next time you buy a CPU. At this incredible early stage, it is really difficult to give a clear answer on whether AMD will overtake Intel.

However, the first signs are very encouraging for AMD fans.

With that said, there are still many different factors to consider before deciding whether to go for Intel or AMD. For example, if you plan to wait for Intel's 11th Gen CPU, remember that you may need to buy a new motherboard as well. On the other hand, AMD offers backward compatibility-it only needs a small BIOS update for its new Ryzen 5000 series CPUs to run on 400/500 series motherboards. Another aspect of

to consider is multi-core performance. AMD has been one mile ahead of Intel in multithreaded workflows for some time. In other words, if you plan to perform some workstation tasks in gaming, you may need to reconsider buying Intel products.

All in all, this is the current guess. A full benchmark will be conducted soon to show the real difference between AMD's Ryzen 5000 Zen 3 CPU and Intel's 10th Gen alternatives.

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields