Skip to content

Bundle for racial equality 742 games

The two most popular Ryzen CPUs in recent history are the R5 3600 and 2600 chips. They share a relatively similar market area, especially since it's been some time since their launch, and either one can be an excellent leap from your old one. CPU. So to help you decide which setting is best for you, let's take a look at their similarities and where they really shine.

speed 3.6 GHz / range 4.2 GHz

core (thread)





speed 3.4 GHz-3.9 Ghz

core (thread)

6 / 12




Although gaming is a very demanding application for things like GPUs, it doesn't actually require multiple cores. Most modern game engines rely heavily on 12 cores, so single-core performance will play the biggest role. So what do these AMD processors pack? These

CPUs have a parallel number of cores, each with a total of 6, so they can run any currently available game in a smooth and immersive manner. The two CPUs are also multithreaded, which means that each core can execute commands at the same time.

As of now, the similarities between these incredible CPUs are beginning to fade, and we are beginning to see how Ryzen is injecting advanced features into its 3600 alternative.

With 3.6GHz base clock and 4.2GHz boost clock, R5 3600 surpassed its predecessor very easily. It's not a mile, but even with this rather small jump in clock speed, you will definitely see the real-world impact.

It should be emphasized that the 2600 is by no means a slow CPU, especially the price. In fact, despite being nearly three years old, it is still a very popular choice for gamers with lower budgets, and it still appears frequently compared to newer and more advanced CPUs. The

2600 has a stable 3.4GHz base clock that can be upgraded to 3.9GHz, so it's not bad.

Some 3600 users claim that it is almost impossible for their CPUs to meet those 4.2 boost clock specifications. Even with liquid cooling, the 3600 is always around 100MHz of its set capacity, but thanks to some beautiful firmware and OC updates, this is no longer a problem.

When we look at its architecture, we will see the fundamental difference between these two CPUs. The 2600 is built using AMD's Zen + microarchitecture, a 12nm process that increases chip density from the original Zen architecture by 15%, increases overall performance by 10%, and increases base frequency by 10%. . Exactly the same power envelope. The

Ryzen 3600 CPU was built from the ground up using the third 7nm iteration of Zen, the name is confusing, Zen 2. Zen 2 is AMD's first correct revision of its Zen microarchitecture.

uses a new suite extension of instructions, and the backward-compatible Zen 2's proficiency in command management has increased by 15%, which basically means it can do more things at once. It has also optimized zero-latency memory mirroring, which is the process of dividing memory into different locations for further integration. Zen 2 of 3600 also increased the cache capacity from 19.5MB to 35.3MB, and achieved a leap from PCIe 3 to PCIe 4, significantly increasing the bandwidth of the GPU.

Remember before we mentioned that multi-threaded kernels are not the best choice for a single game? Well, this is where those many threads will really pay off. The multi-threaded kernel can process multiple instructions at the same time, which can better support parallel workflows.

This means that if you are a tag hoarder and enjoy streaming media, games, music and downloading at the same time, or you may use a lot of video editing or animation software, any of these CPUs can support huge burden. But if 3600 and 2600 have the same number of threads and cores, does it mean that they have symmetric multitasking capabilities?

No, it's not true. Although both are powerful units, the advanced Zen 2 architecture of the 3600 outperforms its predecessor in multitasking compared to the increased teaching process and memory management.

Let us forget all the specs we ended up comparing and see how these CPU cousins stack up on some basic benchmarks, and what really matters... game performance.

As expected, the 3600 dominates the single-core test, and the work efficiency is 21% higher than that of the 2600. The 3600 has a similar 19-21% advantage in handling multi-core workloads. Overclocking alone has consolidated the 3600 advantage, with a 19% personal win rate and a 16-19% multi-core win rate. The

used Nvidia 2060S GPU to test these CPUs in various games and had more struggles with the 2600. It achieved a 3% advantage in 1080p Watchmen, and the average frame rate of the two CPUs exceeded 130fps. However, since then, in the days of 3600, GTA V and PUBG have a low W of 5%, Fortnite's frame rate win rate is 14%, and CounterStrike: Global's fps win rate is 18% out of control.

switched to RTX 2080 Ti GPU to handle demanding 1080p UHQ games (such as Assassin's Creed Odyssey), and we got impressive performance from two CPUs. The 3600 eventually won, but only won one frame while sharing a minimum frame rate of 54 fps.

3600 scored a big win for "Rainbow Six: Siege" in great quality 1080p, but when it upgrades to UQ 1440p, we're back to the 3600 win with a single hairline frame rate, averaging 164 fps. 2600 may not have completely surpassed 3600, but the fact that you maintain and implement these stats is still impressive.


3.6 GHz / 4.2 GHz

core (thread)






However, especially since it offers excellent value for money for gamers on limited budgets, but the price difference between these CPUs is only $ 60, you may just want to save money for 3600. If you have good peripherals, such as a powerful GPUs, it's definitely worth paying for Zen 2's PCIe 4 support and locking in the extra bandwidth to achieve some smooth gaming.

Previous article Alienware 25 gaming monitor
Next article Discord javascript error fixed

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields