Build a gaming pc
A batch of new benchmark results apparently suggest that AMD's Ryzen 4900HS offers better performance than the existing Ryzen 3700X, and even more surprisingly, the Ryzen 9 3950X. Benchmark
was selected by UserBenchmark's Twitter user Tum Apisak, which naturally raises some questions about its credibility. UserBenchmark has naturally attracted people's attention because the site often complains about the accuracy of the results and the generally considered suboptimal scoring standards. Therefore, we recommend being skeptical of all of these.
results show AMD Ryzen 4900HS installed on ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 gaming laptop. Again, the average performance of the AMD Ryzen 4900HS is 96.7%, while the Ryzen 3700X is 91.7% and the Ryzen 9 3950X is 94.1%. In the
-core test, the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS had 140 points for dual-core, 276 points for dual-core, 546 points for four cores, and 1,081 points for eight cores. Although they are not very different from the other two AMD chips (up to about 30 points), they completely outperform them.
Ryzen 9 4900HS and Ryzen 7 3700X octa-core 16 threads, but 35W and 65W, this is very intriguing, but there are too many obvious problems. The results of the
Ryzen 9 3950X are a bit difficult to compare because the chip has 16 cores and 105 W TDP. Therefore, this comparison does not fully utilize all the features of the Ryzen 3950X and is of little value.
In order to further spoil the fun, Geekbench using the same ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 gaming laptop also had similar results, seeing that the Ryzen 7 3700X is much better than the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS. In this benchmark test, single-core and multi-core results show that Ryzen 7 3700X will hit Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Therefore, we estimate that the results are incredibly good, and we need more conclusive evidence to be sure that AMD's Ryzen 4900HS is as strong as UserBenchmark suggests.