Skip to content

Best motherboard for ryzen 9 5900x

Although gaming monitors and general monitors have become larger and larger over time, the demand for smaller 24-inch monitors is still high, especially in the e-sports gaming community. The Acer Predator XB253Q GP is well suited for the "small display" category, with a compact design and some impressive performance specifications. The core of this

gaming monitor is a powerful IPS (In-Plane Switching) panel with excellent response and excellent immersion, making it an excellent choice for competitive gamers. The display was launched with a 144Hz refresh rate, an impressive 0.9ms (minute) GTG response time, and VESA DisplayHDR 400 certification. In addition, XB253Q relies on adaptive synchronization support for AMD FreeSync and Nvidia Gsync, making it one of the first panels in the Predator series to cancel the dedicated GSync module, which was once famous for this feature.

In the next article, we will test the Acer Predator XB253Q to see how it performs in several different scenarios; including gaming, color accuracy, image quality, and overall price/performance.

Since there is a lot to experience, don't waste time sneaking into it!

Refresh rate

144 Hz

Response time

2ms (0.9ms min.GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Amazon purchase refresh rate

4 milliseconds

milliseconds (

milliseconds) 444 milliseconds (

milliseconds) ) 444 milliseconds (


screen size




aspect ratio


panel type



400D/square meter



color 8-bit depth

Viewing angle

178 ° / 178 °

Color gamut

99% sRGB

Backlight technology


Panel coating





100 x 45.4 48 x 43 45 mm x 43 45 40 40 48 mm bracket x3 45 40 45 40 input

1 x Predator XB253Q GP widescreen LCD monitor 1 x DisplayPort cable 1 x HDMI cable 1 x power cord (US) 1 x cable USB 3.0


Good relationship Value for money

144Hz Refresh rate

Minimum 0.9 (GTG response time)

Multi-function support

99% sRGB coverage

Low input delay


HDR performance problem

Small side


from Acer The front small box is in Some marketing materials are displayed outside-including some top specifications. The monitor is placed in the box completely disassembled; it is necessary to build a support and a base before use.

It is very easy to assemble the display, no tools are needed, just a few simple steps. In the box, users will also find the following items:

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1084 4 4 4 Amazon Specifications 4 4 Amazon, let's take a closer look at the build quality, design and mechanical features of this monitor The

XB253Q has all the design features you would expect from a Predator monitor. It provides a rigorous gaming aesthetic, characterized by sharp lines and eye-catching features. The panel itself provides slim bezels on all sides, and the bottom bezel proudly contains the Predator logo. The monitor is mounted on a powder-coated silver tripod-type stand. The

silver base is probably the most eye-catching feature of this display, in sharp contrast to the other dark themes of the display.

Turning to the back of the display, there are really not many design features to discuss. The back of the panel is also exclusive matte black, and the only significant design feature is the Acer logo in the upper right corner. The back of the stand provides sharper edges, as well as some holes for cable management and headphone stand. Some red flashes can be found at the bottom of the stand, but honestly, they don't really add much to the design of this display. The

Predator series is Acer's gaming series, and many of their displays provide excellent build quality. In other words, this is one of the predator models in the budget; it will be interesting to see how it accumulates in this particular sector.

My initial feelings about the build quality of XB253Q were very positive. By putting the display together, you can really understand how built it is. Each accessory is firmly fitted into its housing, making the display truly sturdy.

Although the bracket is a mixture of metal and plastic, it still feels very strong. The plastic used for the bracket shell is aesthetically pleasing to a large extent, but still feels of high quality. One area that feels a bit rushed is the headphone stand. It appears from the back of the screen, but can be very stiff. The

panel itself feels very sturdy too and scored highly in our ruggedness test. You will not hear a squeak when you apply light pressure to your back and sides; this is always a good sign. The bezels fit snugly against the panel and provide a flush fit, which is sometimes rare on inexpensive products. The stand itself also provides a very sturdy base for the XB253Q monitor. I hardly encountered any tremors during gameplay, even though things got a bit fierce in CS: GO.

Like most modern panels, XB253Q is equipped with an anti-glare coating, a matte finish, and a 3H hardness. This special material is not only ideal for mitigating the effects of natural and artificial light sources, it also adds another layer of protection to the most delicate internal components. One downside to this

coating is that it leaves a ton of fingerprints very quickly. You can

The interior of the sports mount feels very strong and requires considerable force to move.

The following are the specific media specifications:

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 4443B Unlike Amazon 4443B and other monitors 4443B, is provides a large amount of input: it allows users to connect multiple devices to this panel at any time. Most of the

monitor inputs can be found on the rear of the panel and should be plugged in vertically. That is, there are two USB Slots on the left side of the monitor (one of them can be charged at high speed), which can be used for peripheral devices or charging ports. The

XB253Q OSD (On Screen Display) is basic and comprehensive. Don't overcomplicate things with too many buttons and menus; makes things intuitive. The menu can be navigated via the 5-way joystick on the rear and the other four buttons that control the quick menu and power.

In the OSD, users will be able to customize all common suspicious objects, including colors, images, and game settings. In addition to the standard features, XB253Q has some cool additional features, including Overdrive, VRB, and ultra-low latency mode. Finding the perfect balance between image quality and responsiveness is something we'll discuss later in the article, but it does involve trial and error in the end. OSD also provides many different user modes, which you can save to the monitor's built-in memory, very convenient for people who like to play different kinds of games.

Excellent colors and excellent image quality are the two main factors that help you create a feeling of immersion in the game. In this case, gaming monitors do not always calibrate colors to colors that are considered accurate in some color spectrum, such as sRGB / Rec.709.

For this reason, we like to test the color reproduction of each monitor we review to understand how they perform in a scene 0 with color accuracy.

The results are as follows.

As usual, we run an initial "out of the box" color test to see how accurate existing colors are. As can be seen from the table above, the results are surprisingly good. XB253Q records the pure white point along with the equally impressive depth of black (0.20). We also see an improved contrast ratio of 1247: 1, which is higher than the advertised 1000: 1. The average deltaE is 1.42, which is not the best we have seen, but it is by far the worst.

Gamma stabilized at 2.21.

Next, we ran the built-in sRGB preset, and the results were again surprising: for gaming monitors. We see a white point of 6390K and a deep black of 0.13. The contrast is still higher than 1000:1 (1215:1), and the gamma value is 2.19. However, the most impressive is the mean deltaE of 0.73. Although we may get better results with the calibrated profile, this is more than enough for some small photo edits.

We ended up testing the user color presets and as far as I know this is a copy of the "out of the box" preset with an open RGB field. The white point is perfect and the depth and contrast of the black are slightly better than expected. The average deltaE is 1.45, which provides an acceptable level of precision in the sRGB spectral range.

We quickly calibrated the monitor (using the user's color temperature) to see the accuracy of the Acer Predator XB253Q. For best results, we change the RGB value to 50/49/49 and run the calibration. After

is calibrated, the Acer XB253Q has been greatly improved, and both the white point (6490K) and the black depth (0.10) show high points. The contrast ratio is still higher than the 1000:1 advertising specification, and the gamma value is 2.2. After calibration, XB253Q provides excellent accuracy in large-scale tests of the sRGB spectrum. We see that the average deltaE is 0.17 and the maximum is 0.86, which makes this panel very accurate for editing videos or photos.

Panel Uniformity is a test we run to verify the brightness and color uniformity of the entire screen. During this test, the central square was used as the reference space. Then test every two squares to see how different it is from the reference value.

In an ideal world, we want each square to be green, which means that it does not exceed the difference threshold; we can set it at the beginning of the test.

Note: Results will vary from panel to panel.

When it comes to panel uniformity, XB253Q is a bit frustrated in most cases. As you can see, the uniformity on the left side of the panel is much better than on the right, and the lower right corner returns a red score of

, showing a large deviation from the center reference quadrant.

For most modern LED panels, the brightness and color uniformity of the edges may decrease slightly. This is definitely the case with this monitor, and got an average score in this test.

Like most IPS panels, this panel scores high in terms of viewing angles. The color starts to change slightly at very dark angles, but in most cases, the brightness and color are accurate. This applies to both horizontal and vertical viewing positions.

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Purchase 444C from Amazon The accurate measurement part of the calibration process will provide the colors that the color calibration monitor can provide The following is the color gamut test result:

As can be seen from the above data, XB253Q returns a good color gamut. It is true that this monitor does not provide the widest color gamut, but it does provide

Test the color accuracy and image quality by checking the maximum brightness, minimum brightness, and 120 candles on this panel. The results are as follows:

For those who want to use our calibrated color profile, they will find a link below to download a zip file. The color accuracy of

is not affected. It is time to let Predator XB253Q experience a variety of different game scenarios to see how it performs in terms of pixel response, input delay and HDR content. Since this is Acer's high-end gaming line, I only hope it can bring the best gaming experience. This is the result.

Before we begin, we enable the maximum refresh rate (144Hz) in the GPU control panel. We also enabled adaptive sync (Gsync), set Overdrive to normal, and set ultra-low latency to "on."

I started out playing CS: GO - this is a fast paced first person shooter game, from response point of view it will push XB253Q to the limit. I started out by playing Deathmatch, a game mode in which more than 20 players are alive at the same time. This is a good way to measure the response speed of the panel and the degree of perceived motion blur you experience. Fortunately, the platform I use can easily provide 144 frames per second, keeping up with the display's refresh rate, and providing a smooth experience throughout the game. CS: GO feels very smooth, mainly due to the high refresh rate, low response time and excellent input delay. Due to the combination of these specifications, the game's motion blur has been significantly reduced, allowing you to focus on the game world more clearly during intense battles.

We made sure to pay special attention to ghosting and tracking, but the response time did an excellent job of minimizing these artifacts. In other words, when a bright element comes into contact with a particularly dark area, there will be some light spots, but there are not too many bright spots. Manipulating the overload settings has an impact on visual overshoot, and the medium provides the best overall experience. To further enhance the viewing experience, users can choose to enable VRB in the OSD backlight strobe function, which can pulse the backlight to increase the pixel response time. Although this has a positive effect on perceived blur, it will significantly reduce brightness.

We decided to put competitive gaming aside and switch to more immersive games. We loaded up Shadow of the Tomb Raider and tested the immersive screen quality and HDR 400 certification it provides. This entry-level HDR standard is the minimum certification allowed by VESA, and the result is considered unsatisfactory compared to higher alternatives (HDR600/1000). In other words, enabling HDR in games and movies has little effect, increasing the depth of detail in extremely bright and extremely dark areas. However, if there is no FALD function, the experience can hardly be said to be a small improvement.

Overall, playing on this panel is a great experience. However, if you prioritize visual performance over responsiveness, then this may not be the right dashboard for you.

So you have it, our full review of the Acer Predator XB253Q, one of Acer's latest budget 24.5-inch gaming monitors. The only answer is whether we think the XB253Q is worth it. Well it all comes down to many different factors, but personally, you have to say absolutely.

With the development of the market and the development of display technology, we see that display manufacturers are more inclined to adopt IPS technology instead of TN alternatives with poor color capabilities. For gamers who need excellent color and excellent response at the same time, IPS is now a very viable option. The Acer Predator XB253Q is a great example of these two features, offering a fast 144hz refresh rate and an equally impressive 0.9 minimum GTG response time. With low input latency and a wide color gamut, the XB253Q appears to be very cheap at its current price - current retail price is about $ 280.

The only real downside to this monitor is its size. It limits the performance of this monitor and is limited to competitive gaming. It is true that users can play more immersive games on this monitor, even some photo edits, but they will age quickly due to the lack of screen space it provides. Although 1080p screen resolution is very suitable for high FPS, it is not ideal for actual screen image sharpness.

So in the end what we have here is a very powerful (competitive) gaming monitor, which is on the shelves at a very affordable price. However, although this monitor checked many correct boxes, it ultimately fell into the category of "one trick pony".

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Buying display technology from Amazon With the development of display manufacturers, we see that

is more inclined It is a substitute for IPS rather than TN with lower color capabilities. For gamers who need excellent color and excellent response at the same time, IPS is now a very viable option. Acer Predator XB253Q is a great example of both, offering a fast refresh rate of 144Hz and an equally impressive 0.9 minimum GTG response time. With low input delay and wide color gamut, XB253Q looks very cost-effective at its current price.

Acer Predator XB253Q GP

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields