Best keyboard and mouse combo for ps4
Now is the best time to evaluate the seemingly ancient battle for CPU supremacy: AMD and Intel, which have just released a new batch of 10th-generation Comet LakeS processors.
Intel seems to intend to directly compete with Ryzen Zen architecture CPUs, not just the logical upgrade and innovation of existing chips. It is unclear whether Intel has achieved this. The new Comet LakeS processor is by no means revolutionary. Intel’s business is the same as usual: there are almost no compelling innovations, no gambling, and Intel is almost unremarkable, but it is gratifyingly predictable.
Although Intel did its best to paint Comet LakeS with marketing paint, touting the chip as the best chip since sliced bread, the reality is far less fascinating. The CPU may be freshly released, but AMD's Zen 2 roster may still be Intel's thorny eye. In this spirit, here are five things AMD does better than Intel.
This point hardly needs to be introduced: AMD products have historically been much cheaper than Intel. Although Comet LakeS does reduce the traditional premium associated with Intel products, this benefit may be short-lived.
A quick glance at Intel’s specifications and price list for the Comet LakeS series release will make this clear. The flagship Core i910900K, priced at $488, is very competitive for Intel, especially with its 10 cores, 20 threads, 3.7 GHz base clock speed, a boost of up to 5.3 GHz and 125 W TDP.
In contrast, AMD’s Ryzen 9 3900X was launched last summer at a price of $499, and contains 12 cores, 24 threads, 3.8 GHz base clock speed, 4.6 GHz boost and 105 W TDP. Although they are not completely comparable, they will compete for the same performance market space for gamers and content creators.
At first glance, Intel seems to be slowly moving towards a price/performance ratio previously only found in AMD products. In a sense, Intel assigns these prices to compete with AMD's direct rival models. The rest of the
Intel Comet LakeS product line also showed roughly the same situation, steadily falling to the entry-level Core i310100, 4 cores, 8 threads, 3.6 GHz base clock speed, 4.3 GHz surge, and 65 TDP. W priced at $ 122.
On Intel's new line, it's hard not to see bargains, but "new" is the valid word here. Intel's goal is to match the price set by AMD almost a year ago. The older the product, the more likely the company will cut prices (at least in the case of AMD), especially AMD's next-gen Zen 3 chip is expected to go on sale in late 2020.
When these new CPUs are released, AMD will naturally lower the price of the Zen 2 Ryzen series, and Intel, if history is useful, will firmly stick to its price. This means that AMD chips will once again regain the cost-effective advantage.
For those who want to spend more money, AMD Zen 3 will be effortless-the new architecture should provide more benefits than Comet LakeS. Intel's latest chips will be placed in a no-man's land, no matter whether we are considering price or performance, they will not stand out.
AMD is clearly ahead of Intel in terms of computing nodes. We only need to look at the fact that the Comet LakeS CPU uses the outdated 14nm process, which is currently nearly ten years old. On the other hand, AMD has been proud to show off its TSMC 7nm forging process on Ryzen and Radeon products for nearly a year.
In addition, Intel’s turbulent relationship with 10nm is well documented, and the company said it does not expect to add 7nm chips until at least the end of next year. On the other hand, AMD's goal is the 5nm Zen 4 chip in 2022. If the initial estimate of TSMC's 5nm process density increase by 1.84 times is true, then this jump will give AMD a further lead. ..
Additionally, AMD has plans to achieve its next-generation leap in the form of the Zen 3 architecture. Although there are still plans to use the enhanced 7nm process node (move to extreme ultraviolet lithography), there are many advantages elsewhere. places, that is, the density of the transistor is expected to increase by 20%, resulting in a 10% reduction in power consumption. . In other words, higher clock speeds can reduce power consumption.
Additionally, there is noise about the introduction of a 10% increase in instructions per clock, a larger cache size, and the new simultaneous multi-threading feature that allows a single core to use four threads (16-core CPU, 64 threads, anyone?). In fact, we can see a significant improvement in overall performance.
Of course, we can expect AMD's historically more competitive pricing structure to affect the Zen 3 products. As mentioned above, this will lead to price cuts for the current Zen 2 series of products.
We don't know the details except the lie from AMD, but if we are to believe the rumors published in 2020, we should know more soon. On the other hand,
Intel currently appears to be floating in the 14-nanometer process, and is likely to be exacerbated by the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on schedule, manufacturing, and distribution.
Gone are the days when AMD was seen as a weaker person who competed with AMD in all respects. Today, the AMD name is almost everywhere, moving from the data center market to gamers via mobile laptops.
AMD is behind the current generation of PlayStation 4 and Xbox One chips, and
A name familiar to game players, consoles, or others.
Similarly, from architectural enthusiasts to pre-designed OEM products, AMD is now a non-existent choice, but is sought after. Topend builds now widely use AMD CPUs, and in the past, everything except Intel was unknown, except for those with limited budgets, they chose the second best option.
From the perspective of performance and price, AMD is no longer regarded as a viable alternative to Intel, but an excellent product in many aspects.
Thanks to the expert guidance and basic insights of CEO Dr. Lisha Su, AMD has regained its reputation that faded ten years ago. What followed was a certain kind of soft power, which AMD made perfect use in its current confrontation with Intel. The rather mediocre
Comet LakeS CPU products will only support this, and the arrival of the AMD Zen 3 products later this year will support that as well. All in all, AMD has not only successfully reversed its own fate, it has also successfully reversed the public's perception of its products.
An interesting aspect of Intel's new Comet LakeS series is the introduction of the new 400 series chipset. Now the new chipset is not necessarily a bad thing. After all, in theory, innovation should bring victory to consumers. The problem with the three new
chipset variants (H410, B460, and Z490) is that they bring a new socket, the LGA 1200. A new slot means a big hit for new motherboards and compatibility. However, this makes sense; Intel hopes to use the Z490 chipset in its 11th generation Rocket Lake CPUs. Therefore, although compatibility may be lacking at present, it may change in the future. However, Intel's change means that any build focused on Intel's previous generation chips cannot be upgraded with a 10th-generation CPU; They need to invest a lot of cash for new compatible motherboards. First of all, PC builds are not cheap, so having to replace the two possibly more expensive components will naturally avoid many components, especially since the Comet LakeS performance improvement is not that important; It is reported that no more than the best is 15%. The
AMD camp has a completely different picture. The company's latest batch of high-end CPUs, the Ryzen 9 series, is backward compatible with previously existing chipsets. So the upgrade is much easier, only need to buy a new CPU, because these new models still use the AM4 socket on the old motherboard.
In a market where consumers spend a lot of money, any savings will surely attract people's attention and make manufacturers seriously consider making the next version of the CPU/socket/chipset configuration compatibility leap to AMD.
Similarly, AMD also caters to those who want to jump to motherboards with updated chipsets, such as the AM4 X570 slot, and the latest features such as PCIe 4.0 and 32GB/s bandwidth in the x16 slot. AMD
covers two types of consumers: consumers eager to cut costs and consumers who are ready to buy a new combination of motherboard and CPU. Gene compatibility is without a doubt one of AMD's most powerful attributes.
Believe it or not, what I thought was crazy gibberish a few years ago has now become a reality. Well, at least according to AMD. On AMD's Q1 2020 earnings conference call, CEO Lisa Su proudly revealed that the company's Ryzen CPUs now account for more than 50% of global high-end desktop processor sales.
More precisely, Lisa revealed that both the Ryzen 3000 series and the Ryzen 2000 series are very popular with consumers and are among the best sellers on the global list of retail bestsellers. This is very interesting, because although the advantages of the Zen 2 Ryzen 3000 series chips are well documented and certainly send a clear message to Intel, the Ryzen 2000 series, despite its age, continues to attract consumers. This shows that AMD's appeal spans multiple generations.
Considering our previous opinion that AMD offers a better price / performance ratio, this should not surprise us. AMD products are over-marketed and their prices are ridiculously low, which also helps in this regard.
Although AMD undoubtedly wants to embellish this achievement and show its comeback story as a marketing tool, the evidence is in the pudding. On Amazon, nine of the top ten best-selling CPUs are, you guessed it, AMD products. The situation on other PC hardware retail websites is roughly the same.
Related to this is that, according to a survey by the European Hardware Association, nearly two-thirds of PC enthusiasts now choose AMD over Intel. Backing this up is the latest CPUbenchmark market share report, which shows that AMD's global market share is the same as Intel's, regardless of CPU type. It is not 50%, but if the situation continues, it is expected to happen soon. The promotion of Zen 3 architecture chips this year may make this happen sooner.
The point here is not to cast a shadow on Intel. In terms of performance and technology for games such as Hyper-Threading, the company still maintains a leading position. There is a reason for Intel's dominance in the last quarter of 10 years. Similarly, Comet LakeS CPU is not a bad product at all, and should provide a considerable generational leap for those who are faithfully rooted in the Intel field.
Taken alone, Intel's dominance is not as obvious as before. In the current landscape between AMD and Intel, even using the term domain feels inappropriate. AMD's earnings are too impressive and impressive.
If you are not sure which company to start