Skip to content

Best graphics cards

It has been more than two years since Intel released its magnificent i9 9900K CPU, and it has been more than a year since AMD released its 3000 series, but the war between these two beloved processors is far from over. Millions of players have yet to decide which one to use in the next version.

Both companies just released more powerful iterations of their flagship designs, and now, as prices drop, is the best time to consider which of these processors is right for you and your system.

adds fuel to the fire and makes this a battle of all ages. We want these two giants to face each other head-on. They will fight each other over original specs, make bold component decisions, fight for performance, and show their worth. Let's get ready for ruuuuumble!

Before we put these two gladiators against each other in bloody electronic warfare, let's take a look at the SKU in the ad.

battle blue shorts have a total of 8 cores, we have 9900K. With red shorts and impressive 12 cores, we have a 3900X. Ding Ding Ding!

In terms of dry SKUs, Ryzen was among the best in the first round. Generally speaking, the more cores a processor contains, the more complex the commands it can execute, resulting in faster and smoother overall performance, especially in parallelized workflows. The number of

cores is not everything, but many modern software are designed to divide the tasks into as many cores as possible, which means that if the number is insufficient, the functionality of the software will be weakened.

These two render boxers are equipped with multi-threaded capabilities. But the 3900X competed with the 9900K in the second round and doubled the 12 cores to 24 threads. Obviously the maximum number of threads for 9900K is 16.

Right now, in terms of fundamentals, the Ryzen 3900X has a very clear winner, but why are these two CPUs being compared and debated so much? Well, let's start speeding up the mergers to better understand its controversial history.

has a stable base clock speed of 3.8GHz, 3900X shows us some very popular footwork, and Intel CPU has a slight lag, the clock frequency is 3.6GHz. It looks like this is another victory for AMD, but this is where things get interesting. The maximum boost frequency of

3900X is 4.6 GHz. Push 9900K to its limit and you will reach an impressive 5 GHz maximum boost frequency.

Assume that if both CPUs have sufficient cooling capacity to boost their maximum clock speed for a long period of time, you will notice a slight improvement in the response performance of 9900K.

Therefore, we would say that Intel participated in this round, but it is important to note that the performance provided by the clock speed will be slightly offset by the number of cores. It can also be said that its slower maximum clock speed makes up for the number of cores in Ryzen. Both

CPUs can be overclocked, but the 9900K is again among the best because the 3900X doesn't have much room for overclocking.

Many modern games require a considerable amount of fast link memory to run at acceptable speeds. Cache is a memory bank located in front of RAM and serves as quick access storage areas. If you play games with a resolution lower than 4K, it is recommended to use a good cache capacity.

L1 capacity is 768KB, L2 capacity is 6MB, L3 capacity is 64MB memory, not to mention 3200MHz DDR4 memory type, 3900X really shows its talent here. The

9900K has an L3 smart cache with a capacity of 15MB and supports a memory speed of 2666 MHz.

This is a huge victory for Ryzen, but let's put the components of these two powerful CPUs under the microscope below and see which one will come out on top of the hardware game.

You should never buy based solely on pure specifications. You buy not just the CPU, but the many different components that make up the CPU. Although these CPUs are often compared, they are made up of very different things.

So, let's take a look at some of the individual parts that are put together to make the magic happen.

First, let's face the obvious difference between these two CPUs. The i9 9900K comes pre-installed with integrated UHD silicon graphics. Ryzen 9 3900X has absolutely no graphics capabilities on the chip.

On the surface, this seems like a big "W" for Intel, but considering that gamers may have outfitted their computers with high-performance graphics, the 3900X's lack of onboard facilities may not have much of an influence.

Another important determinant among these CPUs is integrated cooling. Ryzen 9 is equipped with an excellent LEDladen Wraith Prism cooling solution, while the Intel i9 9900K does not have a built-in cooling method.

So here to reverse the situation, for AMD, this looks like a big "W". We hope it's that simple. Yes, Wraith Prism is a good standard cooling system, but will it support Ryzen 9 to run at the limit to extend the game time? No.

If you really want to power these CPUs, you need to purchase a separate cooling system for both. The value of

AMD 9 3900X in this respect is more than that. It has 4.0 x16 PCIE, while Intel i9 9900K uses its predecessor 3.0 x8 PCIE. PCI Express defines how to use external hardware, such as video cards or additional storage SSD cards, to upgrade the system. 4.0 PCIE is a cutting edge technology, and this series of AMD CPUs are the first technology products to adopt this technology.

Basically, 4.0 x16 refers to higher

Its technology is future because it will be compatible with new hardware in the next few years.

Of course, cutting-edge technology is accompanied by some compatibility issues, and other aspects of the technological world are also catching up. To support PCI Express 4.0, you need a motherboard that can run at full capacity.

If you can't afford or don't want to replace your current motherboard, the game is not over yet. PCI Express 4.0 will continue to work, but it will not work as it was designed for 4.0.

When you use the most advanced PCI Express in the old port, the motherboard defines the performance parameters; therefore even though it is a 4.0 bit cog, it works like 3.0.

Intel is back in the battle for connectivity. Its proprietary Thunderbolt 3 interface is compatible with a large number of your motherboards and can support other hardware at blazing-fast speeds of up to 40GBps. This means you will be able to sync the 11th Gen Intel CPU that supports 4.0.

AMD, in fact, many technology companies do not want to pay Intel to obtain the right to use Thunderbolt 3 (and even now 4) technology in their systems. This is a huge downside to the AMD setup, especially if you're interested in connecting hardware that requires very low latency, like a music interface.

But these hard, icy specifications and components are sufficient. How does everyone come together to affect your gaming experience? let's start!

Because of the impressive base clock speed, if you still play a lot of old games, especially if you have a large graphics card, 9900K may be better. The faster rate also means that it is more suitable for so-called burst workflows.

Bursty describes the process of receiving information in the form of regular or irregular square waves.

i9 9900K is not only good for old games. When tested against each other while running countless different games, the 9900K is better than 3900X at promoting frames per second almost every time it runs at normal clock speed and overclocking speed.

The gap in some games is so small that you can't feel it when you sit and play. World War Z shows the performance level 2, inventory and overclocking of Intel CPUs. 4,444 racing games like Forza Horizon 4 doubled the i9s lead to 4%, but there is still nothing to do, especially the 3900X managed to cut the difference in half when overclocked.

Unfortunately for AMD, in other games, the 3900X ate the dust of the i9 9900K. Games such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Apex Legends, and Fortnight saw 9900K drift, while 3900X dropped frames around.

When playing massively multiplayer strategy games, the gap between these two CPUs is the biggest. StarCraft is one of our personal favorites, so we checked the frame rate performance of a complete 14-player team multiplayer game and found that the i9 9900K runs 19 times faster than the 3900X under factory settings. Overclocking reduces the gap to 12%. For AMD,

isn't all doom and gloom, because 3900X is slightly better than 9900K in various games like Monster Hunter and CounterStrike Global Offense.

It's also important to note that while the 3900X lost most of these matchups, the difference in frame rate is so small that you won't notice it a million years later.

So Ryzen will suffer here, but only if you run the game at 1080p. Under 4K, the performance is quite stable. What impressed us was the 3900X's so-called small overclocking ability, even if it's a slightly slower CPU, unless you're a hardcore professional gamer, you don't really need extra frames per second.

If you pass these two CPUs through the Cinebench R15 test that evaluates the main workflow, you will find something very interesting. In terms of multi-core performance, the 3900X performed very well, which makes sense. It has more cores. When

is challenging a single core, 9900K really stands out here. What's impressive is that it has nothing to do with gameplay. The 3900X has more resources for running demanding software.

Due to these additional cores and threads, the seamless rendering capabilities of the 3900X will be stronger. So, if you use your gaming computer for other demanding software, such as complex video editors or 3D animation programs, then Ryzen is yours. The best option, under both hands. This is not even a problem.

If you like streaming games on Twitch or watching the stream while gaming, then the multi-threaded 12-core 3900X is by far the most powerful CPU. It will handle all the multitasking related encoding tasks while keeping your frame rate at a reproducible level.

Although 9900K is a faster CPU in most cases, the FPS drops dramatically when running games and video functions at the same time.

So now that we've delved into the gameplay, let's see how much you can expect to pay for one of these bad boys.

When these CPUs were first released, they were priced at around $ 500. Unsurprisingly, based on the release of the new version, both CPUs have lost some share value, but what's interesting is that the 3900X market price is still higher than 9900K. The price of

among them is less than $ 100, but considering the price of Intel's original i9, this is a pretty serious price cut. So it seems that Intel is a company with a limited budget, but you have to wonder why it is not as valuable as AMD CPUs.

may be due to future-oriented architecture

Also included in your decision. Now each CPU has some compatible motherboards, the price is between 150-400 US dollars.

If you intend to really power these CPUs, you might as well consider using a liquid cooling system. This will return you $ 300 or more.

This is a tough debate, but if we're really honest about value, relevance, and overall performance, even if it's more expensive, Ryzen 9 is the best choice for a cheap CPU. But this does not mean that it is suitable for you.

If you are looking for pure single core speed, the i9 9900K is definitely your best choice. Motherboard compatible Thunderbolt connection can achieve excellent zero latency peripheral connections.

In other words, with 12-core over 8-core multitasking capabilities, if your game is multi-threaded, Ryzen 9 3900X is a better choice.

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields