Skip to content

Best gaming chairs under 300

When it was reported that Intel will release an 11th-generation hyper-threaded CPU mainly focused on single-core performance, we shed a bit of tears for our workstation enthusiast friends, because we tried to keep our burning excitement a secret. Obviously, 2021 will be Intel's attempt to regain the gaming throne from AMD.

Last year, Intel did not disappoint, but AMD was looking for blood. Although the i7 10700K has some impressive single-core benchmarks, the Ryzen 5000 CPU is a notch higher. Now, with the contradictory leak of i7 11700K performance leaked on the Internet, we are not sure how it compares not only with the old and new Ryzen, but also with the 10700K.

Even if the i7 11700K is about to launch, things are still unclear, so let's try to separate fact from fiction through "vs" matching, and help you decide whether it is worth upgrading to i7 10700K or you have to wait for Rocket Lake.

speed 3.8GHz/ 5.1 GHz

cores (threads)

8/16

plugin

FCLGA1200 TDP

125W

speed 3.6GHz/4.6 GHz

cores (threads)

8/16

plugin LGA1200

TDP

125W

Amazon

As you may know, the kernel is the basic operating system in a computer processor, so it is a good place to start an exciting bloody showdown. The

i7 10700K has a total of 8 cores and is considered the sweet spot of modern AAA games. For most games, you only need at least four, so this CPU has enough processing power to run all existing games and all games related to release in the foreseeable future.

It is certain that the i7 11700K will not go too far in terms of basic hardware, and we have no reason to argue about it. So what we may have here is a core that differs only in architectural composition.

As most people have already assumed, it is logical to assume that the i7 11700K has hyper-threading capabilities, which means it will have the same 16 threads as the i7 10700K. The problem is that if you stick to the 10700K Comet Lake formula too much, Ryzen will continue to dominate. If you want to believe the controversial "UserBenchmark" report, compared with the 10700K, the single-core and multi-core capabilities of the 11700K are much better. The

clock speed is a powerful assistant to the CPU core. If the core is the pillar that supports the building, the speed of the clock defines the efficiency of the internal business. As we all know, the basic frequency of the i7 10700K is 3.8GHz, thanks to Intel Turbo Boost technology, the frequency reaches 5.1GHz. 3.5-4GHz is recognized as the gold standard for gaming. Although hampered by Ryzen 5000 and even some 3000 series CPUs, 10700K is an excellent CPU. It also badly needs overclocking to hit 5.1 GHz across all 8 cores. Some silicone lottery winners even managed to get their 10700K to 5.3GHz, despite intense cooling.

According to a leak from Russian science and technology website Lab501, 11700K has a base clock speed of 3.8GHz at least right now, a single-core boost of 5GHz, and a multi-core boost of 4.6GHz, but all this is based on a unit test. The goal of the test is that Intel can review the firmware before the product is finalized and released to a large number of gamers.

Intel is not known for the big leap from architecture to architecture, but considering that these chips are said to have similar hardware, Intel will put aside the "little steps" manufacturing process to support the "big step" spirit. This is the only way they can challenge Ryzen's dominance on the playing field. The

i7 10700K is based on Intel's Comet Lake model, with more cores and hyperthreading across the series, improved single-core and multi-core enhancements brought by Turbo Boost Max 3.0, and faster DDR4 memory support than its predecessor Coffee Lake. It is also compatible with the new 400 series chipset based on the LGA 1200 socket.

uses Rocket Lake building blocks, i7 11700K is loaded with Cypress Cove core, which is a 14nm iteration of Ice Lake 10nm core structure. It seems a bit redundant to mine the past in this way, but obviously these cores will have DDR43200 memory support, enhanced deep learning and VNNI support, and 10-19% higher IPC performance. Basically, this means more frames per second and smoother overall gameplay.

The basic requirement for efficient computing and multitasking is hyper-threading (multi-threading in AMDtongue), both of which are available on both CPUs. The only problem is that Intel defends single-core capabilities through multi-core dexterity. This means that although they will have multitasking capabilities, Ryzen CPUs are still the best jugglers, but how do these Intel chips stack up on each other?

If the task to be performed is quite common, i7 10700K is very powerful. We are talking about games, running TeamSpeak and music streaming services, and making tags. For 10700K, these are not problems, but for content creation and demanding parallel workflows, it is not too hot.

We believe that if there is any truth about what we have heard about Cypress Cove, the i7 11700K will provide better support for multitasking, but because Intel is determined to regain the gaming throne, it will still not have a central processing unit. . The first choice of professionals.

speed 3.8 GHz / 5.1 GHz

core (thread)

8/16

socket

FCLGA1200 TDP

125 W

speed 3.6 GHz / 4.6 GHz

core (thread)

8 / 16

socket

LGA1200 TDP

125 W

Amazon

All of these leaks should be solved with a little salt, but for now, Intel seems unable to re-conquer the realm of video games. exists

Performance, is it better cost performance? If the leak is credible, there may be a price difference of approximately $140 between them. The 11700K is equipped with an upgraded UHD 750 integrated graphics, but let's face it, if you spend more than $400 on the CPU, you will have a dedicated GPU that is locked and loaded.

is a difficult choice, but in the end both are excellent gaming CPUs. In our opinion, 11700K sounds delicious, but to say the least, those Lab502 reports are disturbing. It's best to try to wait patiently, wait until the 11700K is released, and make a decision after we have a more comprehensive understanding of its features.

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields