Amd radeon rx 5700 xt
In terms of GPU and CPU, AMD has been a mile behind Intel and Nvidia that I remember. However, due to some impressive arrivals at the AMD camp in July, this trend is likely to change for the first time in more than a decade.
July 7 ushered in a host of new hardware from AMD, including the 3rd Gen Ryzen series and its NAVI RDNA GPU, one of which is the RX 5700 XT. The
AMD RX 5700 XT is highly anticipated by consumers because it was announced a few months ago. It should be on the market at the same time as its powerful new Ryzen product line, and is custom designed for Nvidia's RTX 2070. However, due to the arrival of the Intel SUPER series (a series of GPUs that can provide additional performance at no additional cost), AMD had to re-adjust its target to 2060 SUPER.
Fortunately for AMD, the RX 5700 XT is still very affordable and offers many cool new features that AMD has never seen before. This gives consumers a headache when deciding whether to buy RX 5700XT or Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER.
Let us take a look at the RX 5700XT and see how it can compete with competitors in terms of price, performance, heat dissipation and features.
With this in mind, let's stop wasting time and just jump in.
From a design standpoint, the RX 5700XT offers some of the best aesthetics I've seen in a long time. It is equipped with a sleek design, composed of a dark gray (almost black) color theme, and the red LED flashing in the logo is more prominent.
Many people call it a "dent", which has caused some controversy among buyers, half like it and half hate it. Personally, I think it looks great, according to AMD, it offers more than aesthetic appeal. The dent should be a design feature of the cooling, allowing turbofans to be more efficient in tight spaces, such as SLI.
At this point, I don't fully believe in that theory, but I like the design anyway. In general, the beauty of this GPU is difficult to change, and it looks elegant from all angles.
As mentioned above, AMD has implemented some very impressive features in the new NAVI GPU series, trying to give them an advantage over rival Nvidia. That being said, let us explore them in more detail and let you know what to expect from this outstanding GPU.
Now, although AMD has raised many questions about the 7nm manufacturing process used in the new RX 5700XT, this is not the first time we have seen this on one of their cards-RADEON VII has won the championship. However, this is the first time we have seen it used with the RDNA architecture. The combination of the two clearly shows that AMD has decided for the first time to use this manufacturing process to focus on gaming platforms. So what is the difference between the new architecture in terms of game performance?
Good question. When used with the RDNA architecture, the performance of the RX 5700XT is similar to that of the RADEON VII, but technically it is the weaker of the two cards (and much cheaper). AMD claims that the new architecture should provide an additional 25% performance improvement over cards with the same clock speed using the GCN architecture. good.
Talk Briefly About Heat Dissipation Problem AMD claims that the heat dissipation solution used in this card is better than the previous generation of blower-type graphics cards. Having said that, it is difficult to back up these claims at this testing stage. The fan isn't the quietest thing in the world, but it's certainly not as loud as some next-gen cards released by AMD. I'm looking at you Vega.
Speaking of Vega, one of the biggest changes we saw when comparing Navi and Vega can be found in the new computing unit. RNDA CU is designed around a "workgroup processor". In theory, this means that it uses a pair of connected computing units to share resources in order to better perform work in high-load scenarios. By sharing resources, the RDNA computing unit in Navi still has more dedicated silicon than lastgen's GCN CU.
Each CU will be equipped with an additional scheduler and an additional scalar unit. From a performance point of view, this means that Navi CU may double the instruction speed of the GPU, thereby creating a more efficient computing unit dedicated to games.
Although Vega CU is more suitable for professional workload scenarios, the Navi architecture focuses more effectively on game performance. Good news for players around the world.
So we have learned about some of the features that this card is equipped with, now it's time to look at the level of performance in the game.
Before we start, it is necessary to understand the displayed clock speed and what to expect in the real world. So as can be seen from the above specifications, this card is equipped with a "base clock", "accelerated clock" and "game clock", of which the accelerated clock is the most generous. That said, when we tested the 5700XT, we rarely saw the clock speed reach the height of the displayed boost clock. Our results show that, on the other hand, the game clock is a more realistic number than we can expect in the real world.
So keep this in mind.
In any case, the clock speed is not affected. In most cases, the 5700XT is a very efficient GPU for 1440p games. that
cry. Metro EEXOD, more demanding games, such as the Assassin beliefs, and the shades of Tomb Raider have all the good performance of the game of approximately 6080 fps.
Then, in general it is paid enough.
When this letter is directed to the RTX 2060 supermarket, it uses it on all scenarios and is cleaned almost the floor. On average, he is observing an increase of 10% in the 2060 supermarket, I was surprised that I personally. In other words, it was not far from the 2070 supermarket in many titles. Assign beliefs saw the difference between 2%, but the shadows of the intruder of the tomb showed that there are so few. When 2070 thinks that it is almost $ 100, it begins to observe the real value of this card, AMD Genius is not right.
NVIDIA competitions How was RX 5700XT stack for part of AMD? Well, there is nothing wrong with listening to 5700XT almost controls the field of this department. Let's take Vega 64 as the example of Prime. Vega 64, which has arrived freely $ 499 for dollars, is slower than 5700XT. 5700XT
provides more than approximately 20% speed while the power is low. From a game performance point of view, 5700XT has approximately 38 calculation units that Vega 64, but still provides an ingome of a 20% frame rate.
Radeon VII and 5700XT The differences are very evident, but eventually, both GPU have the same performance of the game, 5700XT is much cheaper. It makes Radeon VII pretty old.
, so we arrived at the verdict. What is the last idea of this GPU?
Well, let us shorten this. 5700XT is very effective when the GPU view from the design point of view, but also obtains the performance of the games. Not only does it destroy the other GPUs of their own family, but also passes after some of Nvidia's best GPU. Thanks to the arrival of the last RDNA architecture, 5700XT had a large amount of redundancy of GPU Lastgen.
When observing the scope of Nvidia, it is difficult to discuss for your GPU, unless it does not require physical support for ray tracking in real time. 2070 super-very impressive card-fear with many games with RX 5700XT. The 2060 supermarket is almost excellent on all fronts.
So, do you think this letter is worth your money? My answer to her is yes. In addition to providing a great performance of the game at 1080p, 1440p, and some 4K games, it also provides excellent aesthetic, better cooling and excellent value for money. Well played in AMD.
If you have questions about this article or RX 5700XT, do not comment on the following sections. However, do not upload to the top towards the center of our community.
The new manufacturing process of TSMC and RDNA Architecture Sport, RX 5700XT establishes the 2060 sites of NVIDIA. The necessary fields are marked *
Comment on my name, email and website in this browser.
WEPC is an essential site for severe PC players. Last hardware and revisions of components and last insufficiency. Take your game pc seriously. So we are. WEPC
© 2021 WEPC. All rights reserved.