Skip to content

Acer predator xb253q

Although gaming monitors, and monitors in general, get larger and larger over time, there is still a high demand for smaller 24-inch monitors, especially in the esports gaming community. The Acer Predator XB253Q GP is well suited to the "small screen" category, with a compact design and impressive startup performance specs. The core of this

gaming monitor is a powerful IPS (In-Board Switching) panel with excellent response and excellent immersion, making it a great choice for competitive gamers. The display has a 144Hz refresh rate, an impressive GTG response time of 0.9 milliseconds (minutes), and VESA DisplayHDR 400 certification. Additionally, with adaptive sync support for AMD FreeSync and Nvidia Gsync, the XB253Q became one of the first panels in the Predator series to abandon the dedicated GSync module, a feature for which it was once famous.

In the next article, we will test the Acer Predator XB253Q to see how it performs in several different scenarios; including gaming, color accuracy, image quality, and overall price/performance.

So there are still many things to experience, let's not waste time sneaking into them!

Refresh rate

144 Hz

Response time

2ms (0.9ms min.GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Amazon purchase refresh rate

4 milliseconds

milliseconds (

milliseconds) 444 milliseconds (

milliseconds) ) 444 milliseconds (


screen size




aspect ratio


panel type



400D/square meter



color 8-bit depth

Viewing angle

178 ° / 178 °

Color gamut

99% sRGB

Backlight technology


Panel coating





100 x 45.

100 mm x 45.8 inches x 43 45 40 40 40 48 40 40 48 40 48 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 mm input

1 x Predator XB253Q GP widescreen LCD monitor 1 x DisplayPort cable 1 x HDMI cable 1 x Power cord (United States) 1 x Cable USB 3.0


Good relationship value for money

144Hz refresh rate

minimum 0.9 (GTG response time)

multi-function support

99% sRGB coverage

low input delay


HDR performance is problematic

Small side

Acer with Acer front box is showing some marketing materials outside-including some top specifications. The monitor is completely disassembled and placed in the box. The stand and base need to be built before use. The

monitor is very simple to install, no tools are needed, just a few simple steps. In the box, users will also find the following items:

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1444 4 44 44 Detailed specifications Amazon buy carefully check The build quality, design, and mechanical features that this monitor is equipped with. The

XB253Q has all the design features you expect from a Predator monitor. It provides a rigorous gaming aesthetic, characterized by sharp lines and eye-catching features. The panel itself provides slim bezels on all sides, and the bottom bezel proudly contains the Predator logo. The monitor is mounted on a powder-coated silver tripod-type stand. The

silver base is probably the most eye-catching feature of this display, in sharp contrast to the other dark themes of the display.

Turning to the back of the display, there really isn't much design feature to discuss. The back of the panel is also exclusive matte black, and the only significant design feature is the Acer logo in the upper right corner. The back of the stand provides sharper edges, as well as some holes for cable management and headphone stand. Some red flashes can be found on the bottom of the stand, but honestly, they don't really add much to the design of this display. The

Predator series is Acer's gaming series, and many of its displays provide excellent build quality. In other words, this is one of the predator models in the budget; it will be interesting to see how it accumulates in this particular sector.

My initial feelings about the build quality of the XB253Q were very positive. Put the screen together and you'll really appreciate how good the build of this thing is. Each accessory is firmly inserted into its case, which makes the screen really sturdy.

Although the stand is a mix of metal and plastic, it still feels very strong. The plastic used in the housing of the stand is largely aesthetically pleasing, but it still feels good quality. One area that feels a bit rushed is the headphone stand. It appears from the back of the screen, but can be very stiff. The

panel itself also feels very sturdy and scored highly in our ruggedness test. You will not hear a squeak when you apply light pressure to your back and sides; this is always a good sign. The bezels fit snugly against the panel and provide a flush fit, which is sometimes rare on inexpensive products. The stand itself also provides a very sturdy base for the XB253Q monitor. I hardly encountered any shaking during the game, even though things got a little bit fierce in CS: GO.

Like most modern panels, XB253Q is equipped with an anti-reflective coating with a matte finish with 3H hardness. This special material can not only reduce the influence of natural and artificial light sources, but also add a layer of protection to the most delicate internal components. One disadvantage of this coating of

is that it can quickly detect a large number of fingerprint traces. could you

The interior of the sports mount feels very strong and requires considerable force to move.

The following are the exact media specifications:

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 "


1920 x 4443B Unlike Amazon 4443B, other monitors 4443B offer a lot of input - it allows users to connect multiple devices to this panel at any time. Most of the

monitor's inputs are located on the rear of the panel and must be plugged in vertically. That is, there are two USB slots on the left side of the monitor (one of them can be charged at high speed), which can be used for peripheral devices or charging ports. The OSD (On Screen Display) of the

XB253Q is basic and comprehensive. It doesn't overcomplicate things with too many buttons and menus, it makes things intuitive. The menu can be navigated via the 5-way joystick on the rear and the other four buttons that control the quick menu and power.

In the OSD, users will be able to customize all common suspicious objects, including colors, images, and game settings. In addition to the standard features, XB253Q has some cool additional features, including Overdrive, VRB, and ultra-low latency mode. Finding the perfect balance between image quality and responsiveness is what we will discuss later in this article, but in the end it is about trial and error. OSD also provides several different user modes, you can save these modes to the monitor's built-in memory, which is very useful for people who like to play different types of games.

Excellent colors and excellent image quality are the two main factors that help you create a sense of immersion in the game. In this case, it is not always considered accurate for gaming monitors to calibrate colors to some color spectrum, such as sRGB / Rec.709.

For this reason, we like to test the color reproduction of each monitor we reviewed to understand how they perform in accurate color scenes.

The results are as follows.

As always, we conducted an initial "out of the box" color test to see that the colors were correct from the start. As can be seen from the above table, the results are surprisingly good. XB253Q records pure white point and equally impressive black depth (0.20). We also saw an increase in contrast ratio of 1247:1, surpassing the advertised 1000:1. The average deltaE is 1.42, which is not the best we have seen, but it is by far the worst.

Gamma stabilized at 2.21.

Next, we ran the built-in sRGB preset, and the results were again surprising: for gaming monitors. We see a white point of 6390K and a black depth of 0.13. The contrast is still higher than 1000:1 (1215:1), and the gamma value is 2.19. However, the most impressive is the mean deltaE of 0.73. Although we can get better results with the calibrated profile, this is more than enough for some small photo edits.

We ended up testing the user color presets, as far as I know it is a copy of the "out of the box" preset with an open RGB field. The white point is perfect and the depth and contrast of the black are slightly better than expected. The average deltaE is 1.45, which provides an acceptable level of precision in the sRGB spectral range.

We quickly calibrated the monitor (using the user's color temperature) to check the accuracy of the Acer Predator XB253Q. For best results, we change the RGB value to 50/49/49 and run the calibration. After

calibration, Acer XB253Q has been greatly improved, showing high points in both white point (6490K) and black depth (0.10). The contrast ratio is still higher than the 1000:1 advertising specification, and the gamma value is 2.2. After calibration, XB253Q provides excellent accuracy in large-scale tests of the sRGB spectrum. We see that the average deltaE is 0.17 and the maximum is 0.86, which makes this panel very accurate for editing videos or photos. The

panel uniformity is a test we ran to check the uniformity of brightness and color on the screen. During this test, the central square was used as the reference space. Then test all other squares to see how far it differs from the reference value.

In an ideal world, we want all the squares to be green, which means that it does not break the differential threshold, which we can set at the beginning of the test.

Note: The results will vary from panel to panel.

Judging from the uniformity of the panel, XB253Q is somewhat unexpected in most cases. As you can see, the uniformity on the left side of the panel is much better than on the right side - the lower right corner returns the red score -

shows a large deviation from the central reference quadrant.

For most modern LED panels, edge brightness and color uniformity may vary slightly. This is definitely the case with this monitor and it got an average score on this test.

Like most IPS panels, this panel has achieved good results in terms of viewing angles. Colors start to change slightly at very fuzzy angles, but in most cases, brightness and color are accurate. This applies to both horizontal and vertical viewing positions.

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Buy from Amazon

The monitor will be used as part of the calibration process to measure with accuracy the color gamut that the monitor can provide The following is the color gamut test result:

As can be seen from the data above, XB253Q returns a good color gamut. It is true that this monitor does not provide the widest color gamut, but it does provide

Test the image quality and color accuracy by checking the maximum brightness, minimum brightness, and 120 candles on this panel. The result is as follows:

For those who want to use our calibrated color profile, they will find a link below where they can download the zip file. The color accuracy of

is not affected. It is time to let Predator XB253Q experience a variety of different game scenarios to see how it performs in terms of pixel response, input delay and HDR content. Since this is Acer's high-end gaming line, I only hope it can bring the best gaming experience. This is the result.

Before we start, we enable the maximum refresh rate (144Hz) in the GPU control panel. We have also enabled adaptive synchronization (Gsync) and Overdrive on normal and ultra-low latency.

I started playing CS: GO, which is a fast-paced first-person shooter game. From a response point of view, it will push XB253Q to the limit. I started by playing deathmatch, which is a game mode in which more than 20 players are alive at the same time. This is a good way to measure the sensitivity of the panel and the degree of motion blur you experience. Fortunately, the equipment I use can easily deliver 144 frames per second, keeping up with the screen refresh rate and providing a smooth experience throughout my gaming session. CS: GO feels very smooth, mainly due to the high refresh rate, low response time, and excellent input lag. Due to the combination of these specifications, the motion blur of the game is greatly reduced, allowing you to focus on the game world more clearly in moments of fierce battle.

We made sure to pay special attention to ghosting and smearing, but the response time did an excellent job of minimizing these artifacts. In other words, when bright elements come into contact with particularly dark areas, there will be a slight tail, but nothing is too obvious. Manipulating the overload settings has an impact on visual overshoot, and the medium provides the best overall experience. To further enhance the viewing experience, users can choose to enable VRB in the OSD backlight strobe function, which can pulse the backlight to increase the pixel response time. Although this has a positive effect on perceived blur, it will significantly reduce brightness.

We decided to put competitive gaming aside and switch to more immersive games. We loaded up Shadow of the Tomb Raider and tested the immersive screen quality and HDR 400 certification it provides. This entry-level HDR standard is the minimum certification allowed by VESA, and the results are considered unsatisfactory compared to higher alternatives (HDR600/1000). In other words, enabling HDR in games and movies has little effect, increasing the depth of detail in extremely bright and extremely dark areas. However, if there is no FALD function, the experience can hardly be said to be a small improvement.

Overall, playing on this panel is a great experience. However, if you prioritize visual performance over responsiveness, then this may not be the right dashboard for you.

So you have it, our full review of the Acer Predator XB253Q, one of Acer's latest budget 24.5-inch gaming monitors. The only answer is whether we think the XB253Q is worth it. Well it all comes down to many different factors, but personally, you have to say absolutely.

With the development of the market and the development of display technology, we see that display manufacturers are more inclined to adopt IPS technology instead of TN alternatives with poor color capabilities. For gamers who need excellent color and excellent response at the same time, IPS is now a very viable option. The Acer Predator XB253Q is a great example of these two features, offering a fast 144hz refresh rate and an equally impressive 0.9 minimum GTG response time. With low input latency and a wide color gamut, the XB253Q appears to be very cheap at its current price - the current retail price is about $ 280.

The only real downside to this monitor is its size. It limits the performance of this monitor and is limited to competitive gaming. It is true that users can play more immersive games on this monitor, even some photo edits, but they will age quickly due to the lack of screen space it provides. Although the 1080p screen resolution is very useful for high FPS, it is not ideal for the image clarity of screen space.

So in the end, what we have here is a powerful (competitive) gaming monitor that is on the shelves at a very affordable price. However, while this monitor checked a lot of correct boxes, it ended up in the "one trick pony" category.

Refresh rate


Response time

2ms (0.9ms min. GTG)

Screen size

24.5 ″


1920 x 1080

Buy Amazon

Display manufacturer As the market develops, the technology of Displays become increasingly tight compared to TN alternatives with poor color capabilities, IPS is preferred. For gamers who need excellent color and excellent response at the same time, IPS is now a very viable option. The Acer Predator XB253Q is a great example of these two features, offering a fast 144hz refresh rate and an equally impressive 0.9 minimum GTG response time. With low input lag and wide color gamut, XB253Q appears to be cheap at the current price of

Acer Predator XB253Q GP

Previous article Flight simulator intro games hardware

Leave a comment

Comments must be approved before appearing

* Required fields